According to me phenyl should decrease the reactivity as its electron withdrawing nature destabilises the carbocation.


Not always, and it can depend upon the groups attached to a phenyl ring, like $\ce{-OMe, -COOH, -NH2, -NO2, -X}$, etc.

The attachment of a phenyl ring to a carbon-containing double bond can affect both the stability of carbocation and the possibility of attacking with the help of the compound's $\pi$-electron cloud.

If you have only the phenyl ring with no substitution, first of all the $\pi$-electron cloud of the double bond will be in high conjugation with the phenyl ring, and thus the $\pi$-electron density will be reduced on the $\ce{C=C}$ double bond, which can reduce the possibility of attack of that double bond to a electrophile. Though the carbocation formed can be stabilised through resonance with the phenyl ring (as it is a benzyl carbocation), the step of carbocation formation can have a very high activation energy ($E_\mathrm a$) if you don't have enough stabilisation of the carbocation. But, if you have the carbocation which can stabilise through resonance with multiple benzene rings, the actual potential energy of the carbocation can be reduced to a great extent. In that case, the rate of reaction will increase.

So, actually this situation can be thought as a competition between the stability of carbocation and the decreased electron density. Generally, the stability of carbocation is the dominating effect if it is stabilised to a large extent.

The rate will be decreased even more if an electron withdrawing group is attached to the phenyl ring due to even more delocalisation of $\pi$-electron cloud, and less stabilisation of the carbocation.

If you have a strong electron donating group attached to a phenyl ring and the double bonded carbon is ortho/para w.r.t that group, that can itself exhibit the $+R$ effect, and increase electron density near the double bond through delocalisation of its own electron density through the $\pi$-bonds. In that case, the attacking of $\ce{C=C}$ double bond to a electrophile will be much easier, and the carbocation formed will be even more stable. Then, the rate of reactivity of the double bond in the electrophilic addition can increase for attachment of a substituted phenyl ring.

  • $\begingroup$ In but-2-ene one sp3 carbon and a hydrogen atom attached to a sp2 carbon when replaced by two phenyl cations then the resulting molecule is more reactive towards electrophilic addition reaction than but-2-ene. Can you explain it? $\endgroup$ – Isha Roy Mar 24 '18 at 12:40
  • $\begingroup$ answer has been edited. Please check it out. $\endgroup$ – Soumik Das Mar 24 '18 at 12:50
  • $\begingroup$ But then why toluene is more reactive towards chlorination than an alkene for eg. propene? $\endgroup$ – Isha Roy Mar 24 '18 at 13:02
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This case and the case in your question are different. Here the rich $\pi$-electron cloud of benzene itself donates, but in your question, it was not so. $\endgroup$ – Soumik Das Mar 24 '18 at 13:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.