# Viability of proposed carbon-carbon bond-forming reaction

Here is my proposed synthetic pathway to make propanoic acid from bromoethane:

1. $\ce{CH3-CH2Br ->[\ce{KCN(aq)}][\text{heat}] CH3-CH2-C#N}$
2. $\ce{CH3-CH2-C#N ->[\ce{KOH(aq)}][\text{heat under reflux}] CH3-CH2-COOH + NH3\uparrow}$

I have some questions about my proposed pathway:

1. Is it viable at all?
2. If so, what might be the disadvantages compared to other carbon-carbon bond-forming reactions such as the Grignard reaction?
3. If it is viable, what is the estimated yield?
4. If it is viable, how can I improve the yield? Can I use silver ions to increase the yield of the first step?
5. If it is viable, how might I isolate the product?
6. If it is not viable, can I fix it? If so, how?
• Honestly, I'd just buy it ;) If I had to make it in the lab, I'd oxidize the sh*t out of n-propanol :D. If I had to make it on an industrial scale, I'd do a hydroformylation. I'd avoid bromoethane with its rather low boiling point (39 °C) and the health risks (H351). – Klaus-Dieter Warzecha Jan 14 '17 at 10:56
• Bromoethane is just an example. It works with any alkyl bromide. – DHMO Jan 14 '17 at 11:00
• The Grignard reaction with $\ce{CO2}$ is just one step. On the down side, you need a dry solvent. – Klaus-Dieter Warzecha Jan 14 '17 at 11:05
• well it's another step to prepare the Grignard reagent. Also, less steps does not mean more yield. – DHMO Jan 14 '17 at 11:07
• That's in situ. Suspend magnesium in diethyl ether or THF, add a the alkyl bromide (and maybe some iodine as a starter), stir. The let a stream of dry $\ce{CO2}$ through the solution. A flask with dry ice, a tube with a drying agent and a stream of nitrogen will do. All that is pretty much one reaction without workup in between. – Klaus-Dieter Warzecha Jan 14 '17 at 11:16

With some some minor modifications, your two stage reaction

1. Kolbe nitrile synthesis
2. alkaline hydrolysis of the nitrile to corresponding carboxylic acid

will work in principle.

In the Organikum, 21. edition, 2001, p. 256ff, a general procedure for the reaction of alkyl bromides with sodium cyanide is provided.

The procedure distinguishes between reactive and less reactive halides.

Reactive halides are benzyl halides (unsubstituted, methoxy- or methyl-substituted.

Less reactive halides are halogen-substituted benzyl halides and plain alkyl halides.

For the latter, the following procedure is described:

In einem 1-l-Dreihalskolben mit Rührer, Rückflußkühler und Innenthermometer werden 250 ml Triethylenglycol, 1,25 mol gut gepulvertes, trockenes Natriumcyanid und l mol Alkylbromid oder Alkylchlorid unter gutem Rühren vorsichtig erhitzt. Der Beginn der stark exothermen Reaktion ist bei den niederen Alkylhalogeniden daran zu erkennen, daß die Lösung aufsiedet. Man steigert die Temperatur langsam auf 14O °C, bei der Umsetzung von Benzylhalogeniden nur auf 100 °C, und rührt bei dieser Temperatur noch 30 Minuten.

(Translation: In a 1-liter three-necked flask equipped with stirrer, reflux condenser and internal thermometer, 250 ml of triethylene glycol, 1.25 mol of well-powdered and dry sodium cyanide and 1 mol of alkyl bromide or alkyl chloride are carefully heated. The beginning of the strongly exothermic reaction in the lower alkyl halides is evident from the fact that the solution settles. The temperature is slowly raised to 140 °C, while the reaction of benzyl halides is only to 100 °C, and stirring is continued at this temperature for 30 minutes.)

The solvent is triethylene glycol with a boiling point of 291 °C, and the reaction is performed under exclusion of water using dry sodium cyanide.

As I have mentioned in my comment, the low boiling point of bromoethane is a disadvantage!

In fact, the Organikum recommends the use of diethyl sulfate (bp 209 °C) for the synthesis of propionitrile (bp 118 °C) and suggests to isolate the product by distilling it off the reaction mixture.

For further purification of the more volatile nitriles with an alkyl chain shorter than $$\ce{C5}$$, it is mentioned to

• wash then with brine
• dry over calcium chloride
• re-distill over a 30 cm Vigreux column

For this reaction (to propionitrile), the yield is given as 90%. (For valeronitrile, hexanenitrile and heptanenitrile, which all can be prepared from the corresponding bromides, the given yields are around 80%).

According to the Organikum (p. 500) the hydrolysis of primary nitriles is achieved by heating 1 mol of the nitrile with 2 mol of 25% aqueous sodium hydroxide solution under reflux until no more ammonia evaporates (2 to 1o hours).

Whether you really want to use this two stage procedure of perform a Grignard reaction of the bromides with $$\ce{CO2}$$ is up to you. As mentioned in the comments, the advantage of the Grignard pathway is that it's pretty much a one-pot reaction all the way down to the carboxylic acid. The downside is the requirement of a dry solvent.

### Update

In a comment, you asked for a recommendation on which carboxylic acid to synthesize.

I would synthesize a compound if

• I need it (for further studies)
• it is not commercially available
• it costs a fortune. (Make sure that the halide that you need as a starting material is not more expensive than the final carboxylic acid.)

If it is just for practise, I'd go for phenylacetic acid (or a donor-substituted derivative), which has the following advantages:

• benzyl bromide is a (weak) lacrymator, but not a CMR compound
• the reaction with sodium cyanide can be carried out in refluxing acetone (instead of triethylene glycol)
• phenylacetic acid, the final product, has a melting point of 77 °C and a rather low solubility in water (< 2 g/L). The product can be purified by crystallization.
• How would you lower the "yield" of the isonitrile in the first step? – DHMO Jan 14 '17 at 15:58
• @DHMO I'd just rely on the elevated temperature :) Isonitriles undergo rearrangement to nitriles upon heating. – Klaus-Dieter Warzecha Jan 14 '17 at 16:08
• @KlausWarzecha I would have suggested the Grignard pathway too – Eashaan Godbole Jan 14 '17 at 16:37
• Perfectly good solution in my opinion. I do think the OP's question number 5 has been ignored in the discussions and answers though (how to isolate the product). At the end of the reaction described in this answer, the product and any by-products, etc., will still be in the triethylene glycol solution. Separating the solvent and un-reacted reagents via simple distillation might be sufficient. Acid-base extraction of the propanoic acid might help further separate it from other organics. Thoughts? – airhuff Jan 14 '17 at 19:45
• @airhuff Yes, acid-base extraction would suffice here. (I mentioned it to OP in chat earlier today.) – orthocresol Jan 14 '17 at 21:52