9
$\begingroup$

I am doing the following question:

Calculate the pH of a $4.00\ \mathrm{mol\ L^{-1}}$ solution of citric acid. $\mathrm{pK_{a1}} = 3.09~~~~~ \mathrm{pK_{a2}} = 4.75~~~~~ \mathrm{pK_{a3}} = 6.40$

Usually for polyprotic acids, we can assume that the second, third and other dissociations of $\ce{H+}$ ions are negligible when compared to the first dissociation. However I believe that this is only valid when the pKa values are separated by around 4. So for citric acid, this would be an invalid assumption as the pKa values are pretty close to each other.

Now, I can find the pH of the solution by doing the long way by first finding the amount of $\ce{H+}$ ions formed by the first dissociation, then using that to find the amount of $\ce{H+}$ ions formed by the second dissociation and so on.

However the room that they have given for this question is pretty small and has only has enough room for a couple of lines of working out and I definitely wouldn't be able to fit all my working out in that box.

So am I missing some short cut method to finding the pH in cases like this, or is the above assumption that I have outline at the start still correct for citric acid?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Looks mighty like they want you to assume the said approximation, despite its being not that great for this particular case. $\endgroup$ Dec 7 '15 at 12:29
10
$\begingroup$

The assumption that the second (and higher) deprotonation steps are negligible for the calculation of the pH of a polyprotic acid is valid for citric acid.

You can compare this by calculating the exact solution and then stepwise neglect deprotonation steps.

(For the sake of simplicity I write $c(\ce{H+})=x$ and $k_{a,n}=k_n$.)

Exact: $$x=\frac{k_W}{x}+c_0(\ce{H3A})\frac{x^2 k_1+2x k_1 k_2+3 k_1 k_2 k_3}{x^3+x^2 k_1+x k_1 k_2+k_1 k_2 k_3}$$ Neglecting $k_3$: $$x=\frac{k_W}{x}+c_0(\ce{H3A})\frac{x k_1+2 k_1 k_2}{x^2+x k_1+k_1 k_2}$$ Neglecting $k_2$ and $k_3$: $$x=\frac{k_W}{x}+c_0(\ce{H3A})\frac{k_1}{x+k_1}$$

Solving those equations give the following pH values (with super unrealistic high precision):

  • Exact: 1.2469291050971560
  • w/o $k_3$: 1.2469291065371300
  • w/o $k_2$ and $k_3$: 1.2470654318802320

As a pH can only be measured precisely within something like $\pm \left(10^{-2}\ldots10^{-3}\right)~\mathrm{pH}$, the calculated pH can be rounded to be 1.247 in every singly case. No matter which deprotonation step was neglected.

So for your case it is negligible. For more general cases I have to look it up and will add it to my answer within the next days.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for the great answer! So is there any rule of thumb about knowing if you can assume the second dissociation is negligible? Before I thought the pKa values had to be different by 4 but that obviously doesn't work for this example. $\endgroup$
    – Nanoputian
    Dec 7 '15 at 19:10
  • $\begingroup$ As always it depends and there is no clear border ... the pictures will follow. But another point ... is this just a "normal" homework excercise from school or is it more "real" from the lab? 4 M is a very high concentration and unless this is not just a "normal" homework excercise - which I assumed - there is no simple concentration=activity assumption. Afaik, this can actually only be made if the concentration is below ~0.001 M. $\endgroup$ Dec 8 '15 at 9:17
9
$\begingroup$

Since the solution will be acid in water, the $\mathrm{pH}$ will be below all the $\mathrm{p}K_\mathrm{a}$ values.

Given that the $\mathrm{pH}$ is below all the $\mathrm{p}K_\mathrm{a}$ values, an upper limit is that the second $\mathrm{p}K_\mathrm{a}$ will contribute $10^{(3.09-4.75)} = 0.022$ protons for each proton that the first $\mathrm{p}K_\mathrm{a}$ contributes.

The effect of these 2% more protons on $\mathrm{pH}$ would be about $\log (1.022) = 0.0009$ $\mathrm{pH}$ units.

In real life, the problems calculating $\mathrm{pH}$ from the information given in the question, would be:

  1. $\pu{4 M}$ citric acid means 768 grams of citric acid in $\pu{1 L}$ of solution. Will that much really dissolve?

  2. If that much did dissolve, and concentration of $\ce{H2O}$ is down to about $\pu{22 M}$ instead of the usual $\pu{55 M}$ , how do you account for that in the equilibrium calculations?

  3. The 3 $\mathrm{p}K_\mathrm{a}$ values are calculated based upon extrapolating ionic strength to zero, what would these values be at $\pu{4 M}$ citric acid?

The $\mathrm{pH}$ of 50% citric acid is reported to be 0.6, and if you could make $\pu{4 M}$ citric acid, it would be still lower $\mathrm{pH}$. It doesn't matter if you use 1, 2, or 3 $\mathrm{p}K_\mathrm{a}$ values, you wouldn't calculate the right value (to say 0.1 $\mathrm{pH}$ units) for a solution that concentrated.

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.