The equilibrium solubility of $\ce{CO2}$ in an aqueous solution is given by three chemical reactions: $$ \begin{align} \ce{CO2(g) &<=> CO2(aq)}\label{rxn:R1}\tag{R1}\\ \ce{CO2(aq) + H2O &<=> H2CO3(aq)}\label{rxn:R2}\tag{R2}\\ \ce{H2CO3(aq) + H2O &<=> HCO3-(aq) + H3O+(aq)}\label{rxn:R3}\tag{R3} \end{align} $$ Considering a system $E_1$ at equilibrium with constant pressure and variable volume, an increase in the concentration of $\ce{H3O+}$ would shift the equilibrium towards $\ce{CO2(g)}$ and consequently result in a change in volume. Let's denote the new system with the altered equilibrium as $E_2$. The law of mass action for each reaction is defined as:
$$ K_1 = \frac{\ce{[CO2(aq)]}}{\ce{[CO2(g)]}},\ K_2 = \frac{\ce{[H2CO3(aq)]}}{\ce{[CO2(aq)]}},\ K_3 = \frac{\ce{[HCO3-(aq)][H3O+(aq)]}}{\ce{[H2CO3(aq)]}} $$
Since $K_1$ is constant at a given temperature, and $\ce{[CO2(g)]}$ remains constant because the pressure is assumed to be constant, $\ce{[CO2(aq)]}$ is also constant. With the same argument, the concentration of $\ce{H2CO3(aq)}$ should be constant. However, the concentration of $\ce{HCO3-(aq)}$ in $E_2$ needs to be lower than in $E_1$ because the concentration of $\ce{H3O+}$ is higher in $E_2$, and $K_3$ is a constant. Therefore, the change in volume can be fully explained by the alteration in the concentration of $\ce{HCO3-(aq)}$.
Does that make sense? It seems quite strange to me that there is no change in concentration for the reactants in $\mathrm{R1}$ and $\mathrm{R2}$