I'll give a quick answer first and come back tomorrow for a more complete version.
In your question, you start with two $\ce{Si}$ atoms and then a third. As you combine these atoms into pairs and molecules, chemistry stresses that the atomic orbitals combine in different ways.
So let's take $\ce{Si2}$. We know that for the $3p$ orbitals, some will become more stable and some will become less stable. There are 3 for each $\ce{Si}$ atom, so a total of 6 molecular orbitals due to combinations of $3p$. (Actually, the $3s$ are also involved, and there's some amount of s-p mixing, but let's ignore that for now.)
Take-home message: when we combine atomic orbitals into molecules, some orbitals become more stable and some orbitals become less stable.
OK, now let's add a third $\ce{Si}$ atom as you said. I'm not going to derive the MO diagram right now. (I'll do that tomorrow and insert the picture.) The main point is that we'll have new combinations. If I take $\ce{H3}$ as another example, I should have 3 molecular orbitals.
As I grow into a linear chain, a 2D sheet, or a 3D solid, I don't have some small number of atoms like 2, 3, 4, 20, etc. Instead, I have 1,000 or 10,000 or many, many more.
Well, those atomic orbitals combine just like they do when you create molecular orbitals. Some become more stable, some become less stable. Yet, rather than having 3 molecular orbitals in $\ce{H3}$ from 3 atomic orbitals, we have 1,000 or 10,000 or many, many more.
Since there are so many orbitals, the energy spacing between them is infinitesimal. These are now called bands.
The type of material (and the atomic composition) will dictate the energy levels of the bands and the so-called "band structure" (i.e., the solid-state equivalent of molecular orbital diagrams). But simply having hundreds and thousands of atoms will give you bands.