3
$\begingroup$

For example If I have to solve the following reaction numerically

\begin{align} *\ce{ + A(g) &<=>[K1] [A*]} \tag{1}\\ \ce{[A{*}] &<=>[k1][k-1] [B{*}]} \tag{2}\\ \ce{[B*] &<=>[K2] [B](g) +}* \tag{3} \end{align}

Where the first and third reactions are fast equilibrium steps.

[* ] represents vacnt site and [A*] and [B*] represent adsorbed species.

The reaction is carried out in a closed container, therefore the concentrations of A(g) and B(g) are not constant. Given initial A(g) and B(g) pressure and assuming zero coverage of reactants initially, how do I solve a system like this numerically.

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ After you specify all the parameters, it's essentially a differential equation problem. I would suggest use matlab (ode45 or other solver). If it fails, use BZZmath or SUNDIALS solver for stiff problem like the one you mentioned. $\endgroup$
    – Osman Mamun
    Commented Sep 12, 2017 at 4:09
  • $\begingroup$ I understand that its a differential equation problem and have solved problems of this nature before. But the rapid equilibrium steps confuse me, I have solved problems which dont have rapid equilibration. I dont have a reverse and backward constant for the first and third reaction, only an equilibrium constant. $\endgroup$
    – ace_101
    Commented Sep 12, 2017 at 4:32

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
2
$\begingroup$

For A adsorption: $$r_1=0$$ because the reaction is in equilibrium.So, $$K_1=\frac{[A]}{P_A \times [*]}$$ From this equation you can relate $[A]$ to $[*]$.Similarly, using the last reaction you can relate $[B]$ to $[*]$. Your [A] and [B] are connected via reaction 2. $$\frac{d[A]}{dt}=-\frac{d[B]}{dt}=-k_1[A]+k_{-1}[B]$$ This is a first order differential equation, so you need only one boundary condition. You have three unknown and three boundary conditions $([A]_0=[B]_0=0$ and $[*]=1.00)$.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ I think that when A * is in rapid equilibrium with A and * you can not write the rate of change of A as you have written. This expression would be valid if A* had not been in equilibrium with A and *. $\endgroup$
    – ace_101
    Commented Sep 12, 2017 at 22:28
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, you are right. There should be two solution regime for this kind of problem (I forgot about that). One is for short time scale and another one for long time scale. I'll suggest consulting William Deen's analysis of transport phenomena book (maybe it was discussed in 3rd or 4th chapter) $\endgroup$
    – Osman Mamun
    Commented Sep 13, 2017 at 5:16
  • $\begingroup$ See chapter 4 of this link (mat.unimi.it/users/scacchi/didattica_2017/biomat2/asy.pdf). This is exactly what you are looking for. $\endgroup$
    – Osman Mamun
    Commented Sep 13, 2017 at 5:18
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks this seems useful, I did not think that you could apply the solution matching approach to a problem of this nature. But they solve the problem analytically, what if I want to do this numerically what do I do? This was just an example system that I chose, the real system that I am interested in solving is rather complicated and definitely doesn't have an analytical solution. Thanks $\endgroup$
    – ace_101
    Commented Sep 14, 2017 at 3:17
  • $\begingroup$ Practically, I have no idea; however, you can simplify your problem by taking few relevant perturbation order (say up to 3rd order), form your system of differential equation system, solve it using a ODE/DAE/PDE solver. In essence, before you form your system of DE just make sure you have a well defined set, i.e., your number of equations and number of boundary conditions are consistent. $\endgroup$
    – Osman Mamun
    Commented Sep 14, 2017 at 5:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.