# Is s-p mixing referring to hybridization or is it the mixing of one atoms s orbital with the other's p orbital?

According to molecular orbital theory s and p orbitals can mix if they are close enough in energy to each other. For period 2 diatomics, this occurs for $\ce{Li}$, $\ce{Be}$, $\ce{B}$, $\ce{C}$ and $\ce{N}$ - in the case of oxygen and fluorine the s and p orbitals are two far apart in energy. The effect can be seen by realizing that s-p mixing causes the $2\sigma_\mathrm{g}$ orbital to be higher in energy than the $1\pi_\mathrm{u}$ orbital.

My question is: Does the mixing of the s and p orbitals occur between the orbitals of one atom (basically hybridization right?) or does the s orbital of one atom mix with the p orbital of the other (and vice versa)?

This has confused me because I realize that concept of hybridization is widely used and functions well so I initially believed that the mixing should occur in one atom - forming hybrid atomic orbitals - and then bonding. However, after I thought about it some more I began to doubt that this is the case. Firstly, the s and p orbitals on one atom do not have the correct symmetry to mix effectively (the s orbital would simultaneously constructively interference with one lobe of the p orbital and destructively interfere with the other). Also, the molecular orbital diagram of carbon monoxide reveals that s-p mixing must be occurring since the $3\sigma$ orbital is higher in energy than the $1\pi$ orbital.

This also seems to contradict the idea that the s and p orbitals mix on the same atom because in $\ce{O_2}$ there is no s-p mixing so why would oxygen mix its s and p orbitals when it's bonding with carbon.

• Note that in your diagram only the valence electrons are shown. Considering all electrons, you would get two more sigma orbitals lower resulting from the 1s orbitals. – Martin - マーチン Aug 3 '18 at 11:26

According to molecular orbital theory s and p orbitals can mix if they are close enough in energy to each other.

We can make that statement a bit more general so that we can apply it to all orbitals, atomic and molecular, by saying,

According to molecular orbital theory orbitals can mix if they are

• close enough in energy to each other, and
• have the same symmetry

Does the mixing of the s and p orbitals occur between the orbitals of one atom (basically hybridization right?) or does the s orbital of one atom mix with the p orbital of the other (and vice versa)?

Good question, you are really thinking about this! First off, yes, mixing of the s and p orbitals occurring between the orbitals of one atom is called hybridization.

When I think of these problems I

• first, hybridize the atomic orbitals (s and p) on an atom to generate hybrid atomic orbitals
• second, mix these hybrid atomic orbitals that exist on separate atoms to form a bond, a molecular orbital

But that's not how it really happens. It is important to realize that hybridization only occurs in response to some type of interaction between two atoms. In other words, only when atoms begin to approach and interact with one another does hybridization start to occur. When hybridization starts to occur, bonding between the atoms starts to occur at the same time. To first hybridize and then bond (like I think of it in my mind) is an artificial construct that allows me to sort things out. Hybridization on an atom and bonding between two atoms both occur simultaneously.

the s and p orbitals on one atom do not have the correct symmetry to mix effectively (the s orbital would simultaneously constructively interference with one lobe of the p orbital and destructively interfere with the other).

Yes they do. As this picture shows we can add and subtract an s and a p atomic orbital to form two $\ce{sp}$ hybridized atomic orbitals.

picture source

in $\ce{O2}$ there is no s-p mixing so why would oxygen mix its s and p orbitals when it's bonding with Carbon.

I think they are leaving oxygen unhybridized. So, for example, they are mixing (adding and subtracting) a carbon $\ce{sp}$ orbital with an oxygen s orbital to form the $\ce{1\sigma}$ and $\ce{2\sigma}$ molecular orbitals in your MO diagram.

Edit: Response to OP's comment

Do you know why s-p mixing raises the energy of the $\ce{2σ_{g}}$ orbital? (it lowers the $\ce{1σ_{g}}$)

Nice diagrams and a helpful explanation can be found here. Basically, It has to do with the symmetry of the orbitals, like I mentioned above. Look at your $\ce{1σ}$ orbital, when you add or subtract it with the $\ce{3σ}$ orbital, the symmetry is such that there is no constructive or destructive overlap. Therefore there is no interaction and there energies will not change. On the other hand, the symmetries of the $\ce{2σ}$ and $\ce{3σ}$ orbitals are such that they can constructively and destructively overlap. As a result they interact and their energies change, one is pushed up and one is pushed down.

• 'According to molecular orbital theory orbitals can mix if they are (1) close enough in energy to each other, and (2) have the same symmetry' That is not correct. (1) The energy of the orbitals does not have to be close. It'll only determine how well (overlap) they mix, not if. (2) They only need to have appropriate symmetry, i.e. a shared symmetry element. Otherwise a sigma bond between a p- and s-orbital would not be possible. As well as hybridisation itself would not be possible. – Martin - マーチン Aug 3 '18 at 11:34
• Hybridisation is nothing that occurs, it is purely a mathematical construct. You can explain any and all compounds without hybridisation. – Martin - マーチン Aug 3 '18 at 11:38

s-p mixing is with respect to one atom.

It means that in the approximation that a molecular orbital is mathematically a linear combination of atomic orbitals, the best approximation involves a significant amount of the atom's s orbital and a significant amount of that atom's p orbital (plus linear combinations of one or more atomic orbitals from the other atom or atoms).

Firstly, the s and p orbitals on one atom do not have the correct symmetry to mix effectively (the s orbital would simultaneously constructively interference with one lobe of the p orbital and destructively interfere with the other).

This constructive and destructive interference is what actually occurs. For example, in methane, with respect to the carbon, there is s-p mixing, with the constructive interference being in the direction of a hydrogen atom.

• Thanks very much. However why does oxygen mix in carbon monoxide but not in diatomic oxygen? Also is this mixing essentially hybridisation or is there a difference? – RobChem Feb 21 '15 at 14:52
• @RobChem What's really going on in CO, is for (according to the numbering in your question) $1\sigma$ the linear combination of atomic orbitals is C-2s 13%, C-2p 11%, O-2s 67% and O-2p 8%; for $2\sigma$ C-2s 17%, C-2p 1%, O-2s 25% and O-2p 57%; and for $3\sigma$ C-2s 58%, C-2p 30%, O-2s 1% and O-2p 9%. J. Phys. Chem. A Vol. 112, p 2437. So while the diagram in your question shows no s-p mixing for carbon, there really is s-p mixing for carbon and s-p mixing for oxygen. – DavePhD Feb 23 '15 at 22:33