I am building a model of simple crystal lattices of rock salt type for different compounds. My goal is to make use of the measured values of ionization energies of atoms and formation energies of compounds from standard state elements and atomization energies of the elements to gain an understanding of the bond types.
The formal charges required for theoretical reasons are, in some cases, not the same as the charges of ions in reality. While looking at a table of Shannon radii, I noticed, it contains values for six-coordinated $\ce{N^5+}$, among other seemingly extreme charges. However, there is no six-coordinated $\ce{O^3+}$.
- Is there really a compound, where nitrogen is six-coordinated 5+ cation? If not, how was this value calculated?
- Can I reliably calculate crystal radii for any element in any formal oxidation state? I only need positive ions' radii.
- Maybe I should, in case of $\ce{O^3+}$, try another approach and assign a minimum possible radius based on Pauling's first rule . For example: if the measured bond length is $\pu{209 pm}$, then the theoretical $\ce{O^3+}$ radius will be $$\frac{0.414}{1+0.414}\times\pu{209 pm} = \pu{61 pm}$$ for octahedral coordination. Is it safe to assume the real radius is less than that?