0
$\begingroup$

Why is the organic compound $\ce{C6H5-CH=CH-CH2Cl}$ named 3-chloro-1-phenylprop-1-ene and not 9-chloronon-5,7-dien-1,3-yne even though there is no specification whatsoever that there is a phenyl group in the organic molecule? $$\ce{C6H5-CH=CH-CH2Cl}$$ can also be written as $$\ce{CH#C-C#C-CH=CH-CH=CH-CH2-Cl}$$ and the name for this organic compound would be 9-chloronon-5,7-dien-1,3-yne. How do we surely know that there exists a phenyl group in the molecule?
Also why is phenyl treated as a substituent and cannot be considered in the longest chain?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In your linear molecule you have -2,4-yne , why not 1,3 - yne? $\endgroup$
    – porphyrin
    Commented Aug 1, 2016 at 18:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Note that the name 3-chloro-1-phenylprop-1-ene is correct and may be used in general nomenclature (for example, the context may favour the chain, so that the unsaturated acyclic structure may be recognized or substituents may be treated alike); however the preferred IUPAC name (PIN) for this compound is (3-chloroprop-1-en-1-yl)benzene. $\endgroup$
    – user7951
    Commented Aug 2, 2016 at 11:10
  • $\begingroup$ @porphyrin my bad...made the edit $\endgroup$
    – oshhh
    Commented Aug 2, 2016 at 11:56

2 Answers 2

6
$\begingroup$

It's a matter of convention.

$\ce{C6H5}$ is conventionally used to represent phenyl because it is a common moiety. Your long, highly unsaturated, chain is also $\ce{C6H5}$, but it wouldn't conventionally be written like that without expansion, unless you're setting out to confuse someone.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ And many chemists would simplify and disambiguate further by writing Ph- instead of C6H5-... $\endgroup$
    – matt_black
    Commented Aug 2, 2016 at 9:26
1
$\begingroup$

The first molecule is cinnamyl chloride and has the structure

enter image description here

where the phenyl group appears.

The reason why phenyl is described as a substitutent is that there is no naming rule which encompasses both aliphatic chains and rings. So chains and rings are considered separately and are substituent of each other. If the highest priority moiety is on a ring, the ring becomes the parent chain. If it is on a chain, like in your case, the chain becomes the parent hydride and the phenyl group is considered a substituent.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This may be helpful, but it doesn't really answer the question. Could you expand it to address what was asked? $\endgroup$
    – jonsca
    Commented Aug 1, 2016 at 23:10
  • $\begingroup$ Note that the given compound actually does not include a principal characteristic group (which is expressed as a suffix or implied by the name of the functional parent compound) that could determine the senior parent structure. Therefore, according to Subsection P-52.2.8 of the current version of Nomenclature of Organic Chemistry, the ring is selected as the parent hydride to construct the preferred IUPAC name (PIN), i.e. (3-chloroprop-1-en-1-yl)benzene. Nevertheless, the context may favour the chain and the name 3-chloro-1-phenylprop-1-ene may be used in general nomenclature. $\endgroup$
    – user7951
    Commented Aug 2, 2016 at 11:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.