Here, A has a greater atomic number than B, which has a greater atomic number than C. To assign E,Z designations you would divide the double bond into left and right portions and assign priorities. On the right side, A > C. However, on the left side, B = B. A (first priority on right side) is simultaneously on the same side and on opposite sides to B (first priority on left side). How would you class this compound then?
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
5
-
$\begingroup$ How would you classify an ethylene molecule without any substituents? Is it E or Z? $\endgroup$– Ivan NeretinCommented Mar 13, 2017 at 14:16
-
$\begingroup$ @IvanNeretin I take it that you mean E,Z nomenclature can permissibly fail to class a molecule? $\endgroup$– lightweaverCommented Mar 13, 2017 at 14:17
-
$\begingroup$ How would you classify a methane molecule without any substituents and without any double bonds? Is it E or Z? $\endgroup$– Ivan NeretinCommented Mar 13, 2017 at 14:18
-
$\begingroup$ @IvanNeretin I thought that E,Z nomenclature was used for compounds with double/triple bonds. $\endgroup$– lightweaverCommented Mar 13, 2017 at 14:20
-
3$\begingroup$ That's right (that is, if you throw away the triple bonds), but there's a catch. First and foremost, any nomenclature (not just E,Z) exists to tell apart different things. Your molecule is identical, no matter which way you orient those A and C. There is nothing to tell apart. $\endgroup$– Ivan NeretinCommented Mar 13, 2017 at 14:25
Add a comment
|
1 Answer
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
When both the substituents are identical on one side of the double bond, the compound does not show geometrical isomerism.
There is no point in using E-Z nomenclature in that case.