Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/StackChemistry/status/914182719264968706
MathJaxified, better title
Source Link
Jan
  • 68.7k
  • 12
  • 205
  • 389

[CoCl4](2-) and Co(H2O)6 Why does heating transform the aquacomples of slightly acidified cobalt(2+II) thermal shiftchloride solution to the chlorido complex?

First of all I'm sorry if this has been asked before but I could not find it anywhere:

There is a famous demonstration where, if you mix a CoCl2$\ce{CoCl2}$-solution with the right amount of HCl$\ce{HCl}$ you will end up with the pink [Co(H2O)6] (2+)$\ce{[Co(H2O)6]^2+}$ complex but when heating it to boiling temperatures it will change to blue as the [CoCl4] (2-)$\ce{[CoCl4]^2-}$ complex is formed. This reaction is reversible as the mixture is cooled again. Now literature always describes that this works because that shift towards [CoCl4] (2-)$\ce{[CoCl4]^2-}$ is endothermic...but, but why is this the case?

What causes one to be more stable here than the other one but being substituted when heated?

I have some ideas but I can't really compare them:

  • First of all there should actually be an entropic advantage towards the Chlorochlorido-side, as 6 water ligands leave, meaning that the exothermic step here is against the natural direction of the entropy(?).

  • Second, perhaps the Chlorochlorido ligand is the better leaving group. I know usually H2O$\ce{H2O}$ is a good leaving group in organic molecules but then its usually a H2O(+)$\ce{H2O+}$. So perhaps Chloridechloride is the better leaving group here.

  • Maybe there is a kinetic effect, that it is harder to displace 6 ligands than just four ligands

  • Or, as much more water is present it just shifts towards the water side because of the huge excess of water?

  • Chloride is a weaker ligand than water. But on the other hand the Ironiron-Fluorofluorido complex is quite stable in water and towards other ligands.

  • So could it be due to the different ligand fields? The splitting in the tetrahedron is much smaller than in the octahedron. Although I don't know how this actually affects the stability.

So those were the ideas I had but I can't really find a common thing among them besides the excess of water which often causes an equlibrium to shift. By

By the way [Cu(H2O)6] (2+)$\ce{[Cu(H2O)6]^2+}$ and [CuCl4] (2-)$\ce{[CuCl4]^2-}$ do the exact same thing.

Does anyone have an idea why this reaction is endothermic?

[CoCl4](2-) and Co(H2O)6(2+) thermal shift

First of all I'm sorry if this has been asked before but I could not find it anywhere:

There is a famous demonstration where, if you mix a CoCl2-solution with the right amount of HCl you will end up with the pink [Co(H2O)6] (2+) complex but when heating it to boiling temperatures it will change to blue as the [CoCl4] (2-) complex is formed. This reaction is reversible as the mixture is cooled again. Now literature always describes that this works because that shift towards [CoCl4] (2-) is endothermic...but why is this the case?

What causes one to be more stable here than the other one but being substituted when heated?

I have some ideas but I can't really compare them:

  • First of all there should actually be an entropic advantage towards the Chloro-side, as 6 water ligands leave, meaning that the exothermic step here is against the natural direction of the entropy(?).

  • Second, perhaps the Chloro ligand is the better leaving group. I know usually H2O is a good leaving group in organic molecules but then its usually a H2O(+). So perhaps Chloride is the better leaving group here.

  • Maybe there is a kinetic effect, that it is harder to displace 6 ligands than just four ligands

  • Or, as much more water is present it just shifts towards the water side because of the huge excess of water?

  • Chloride is a weaker ligand than water. But on the other hand the Iron-Fluoro complex is quite stable in water and towards other ligands.

  • So could it be due to the different ligand fields? The splitting in the tetrahedron is much smaller than in the octahedron. Although I don't know how this actually affects the stability.

So those were the ideas I had but I can't really find a common thing among them besides the excess of water which often causes an equlibrium to shift. By the way [Cu(H2O)6] (2+) and [CuCl4] (2-) do the exact same thing.

Does anyone have an idea why this reaction is endothermic?

Why does heating transform the aquacomples of slightly acidified cobalt(II) chloride solution to the chlorido complex?

There is a famous demonstration where, if you mix a $\ce{CoCl2}$-solution with the right amount of $\ce{HCl}$ you will end up with the pink $\ce{[Co(H2O)6]^2+}$ complex but when heating it to boiling temperatures it will change to blue as the $\ce{[CoCl4]^2-}$ complex is formed. This reaction is reversible as the mixture is cooled again. Now literature always describes that this works because that shift towards $\ce{[CoCl4]^2-}$ is endothermic, but why is this the case?

What causes one to be more stable here than the other one but being substituted when heated?

I have some ideas but I can't really compare them:

  • First of all there should actually be an entropic advantage towards the chlorido-side, as 6 water ligands leave, meaning that the exothermic step here is against the natural direction of the entropy(?).

  • Second, perhaps the chlorido ligand is the better leaving group. I know usually $\ce{H2O}$ is a good leaving group in organic molecules but then its usually a $\ce{H2O+}$. So perhaps chloride is the better leaving group here.

  • Maybe there is a kinetic effect, that it is harder to displace 6 ligands than just four ligands

  • Or, as much more water is present it just shifts towards the water side because of the huge excess of water?

  • Chloride is a weaker ligand than water. But on the other hand the iron-fluorido complex is quite stable in water and towards other ligands.

  • So could it be due to the different ligand fields? The splitting in the tetrahedron is much smaller than in the octahedron. Although I don't know how this actually affects the stability.

So those were the ideas I had but I can't really find a common thing among them besides the excess of water which often causes an equlibrium to shift.

By the way $\ce{[Cu(H2O)6]^2+}$ and $\ce{[CuCl4]^2-}$ do the exact same thing.

Does anyone have an idea why this reaction is endothermic?

Source Link

[CoCl4](2-) and Co(H2O)6(2+) thermal shift

First of all I'm sorry if this has been asked before but I could not find it anywhere:

There is a famous demonstration where, if you mix a CoCl2-solution with the right amount of HCl you will end up with the pink [Co(H2O)6] (2+) complex but when heating it to boiling temperatures it will change to blue as the [CoCl4] (2-) complex is formed. This reaction is reversible as the mixture is cooled again. Now literature always describes that this works because that shift towards [CoCl4] (2-) is endothermic...but why is this the case?

What causes one to be more stable here than the other one but being substituted when heated?

I have some ideas but I can't really compare them:

  • First of all there should actually be an entropic advantage towards the Chloro-side, as 6 water ligands leave, meaning that the exothermic step here is against the natural direction of the entropy(?).

  • Second, perhaps the Chloro ligand is the better leaving group. I know usually H2O is a good leaving group in organic molecules but then its usually a H2O(+). So perhaps Chloride is the better leaving group here.

  • Maybe there is a kinetic effect, that it is harder to displace 6 ligands than just four ligands

  • Or, as much more water is present it just shifts towards the water side because of the huge excess of water?

  • Chloride is a weaker ligand than water. But on the other hand the Iron-Fluoro complex is quite stable in water and towards other ligands.

  • So could it be due to the different ligand fields? The splitting in the tetrahedron is much smaller than in the octahedron. Although I don't know how this actually affects the stability.

So those were the ideas I had but I can't really find a common thing among them besides the excess of water which often causes an equlibrium to shift. By the way [Cu(H2O)6] (2+) and [CuCl4] (2-) do the exact same thing.

Does anyone have an idea why this reaction is endothermic?