Skip to main content
1 of 2

[CoCl4](2-) and Co(H2O)6(2+) thermal shift

First of all I'm sorry if this has been asked before but I could not find it anywhere:

There is a famous demonstration where, if you mix a CoCl2-solution with the right amount of HCl you will end up with the pink [Co(H2O)6] (2+) complex but when heating it to boiling temperatures it will change to blue as the [CoCl4] (2-) complex is formed. This reaction is reversible as the mixture is cooled again. Now literature always describes that this works because that shift towards [CoCl4] (2-) is endothermic...but why is this the case?

What causes one to be more stable here than the other one but being substituted when heated?

I have some ideas but I can't really compare them:

  • First of all there should actually be an entropic advantage towards the Chloro-side, as 6 water ligands leave, meaning that the exothermic step here is against the natural direction of the entropy(?).

  • Second, perhaps the Chloro ligand is the better leaving group. I know usually H2O is a good leaving group in organic molecules but then its usually a H2O(+). So perhaps Chloride is the better leaving group here.

  • Maybe there is a kinetic effect, that it is harder to displace 6 ligands than just four ligands

  • Or, as much more water is present it just shifts towards the water side because of the huge excess of water?

  • Chloride is a weaker ligand than water. But on the other hand the Iron-Fluoro complex is quite stable in water and towards other ligands.

  • So could it be due to the different ligand fields? The splitting in the tetrahedron is much smaller than in the octahedron. Although I don't know how this actually affects the stability.

So those were the ideas I had but I can't really find a common thing among them besides the excess of water which often causes an equlibrium to shift. By the way [Cu(H2O)6] (2+) and [CuCl4] (2-) do the exact same thing.

Does anyone have an idea why this reaction is endothermic?