Why is it that chiral biological molecules are enantiomerically pure? The other enantiomer would have the same reactivity, and the only difference is their angle of rotation of plane polarized light. Why, then, is one enantiomer preferred over the other?

Is it that the enantiomer found in our bodies has some advantage over the other enantiomer, or is it random and luck that the structure we see naturally was chosen?

Are all the biochemicals that our body uses enantiomerically pure or are racemic mixtures too?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ There are no advantages. The lucky isomers were lucky enough to be the first which organized in structures capable of replicating themselves $\endgroup$ – The_Vinz Jul 16 '19 at 10:16
  • $\begingroup$ Enantiomers are preferred because they work. Most of the things they interact with are also enantiomers and they won't interact equally with their mirror images (if a left handed person uses their left hand to try to shake the right hand of someone else, it doesn't go the same way as two right hands shaking). Enzymes made of random enantiomers would have a very different structure than their enantiomerically pure real versions. $\endgroup$ – matt_black Jul 16 '19 at 19:59

Are all the biochemicals that our body uses enantiomerically pure or are racemic mixtures too?

Many molecules exist in both forms in nature. One fun example are the enantiomeric terpenoids R-(–)-carvone and S-(+)-carvone. The R-form smells like spearmint while the S-form smells like caraway. The difference in smell shows that properties other than the optical activity are different for two enantiomers.

Why, then, is one enantiomer preferred over the other?

Nucleic acids

The_Vinz stated correctly in the comments that for replicating structures like RNA, choice of the enatiomer was random; once established, one chiral form prevailed. DNA building blocks have the same chirality as those of RNA because they are made by the same biochemical pathway.

Amino acids

One amino acid, glycine, is not chiral. Many amino acids are found in both forms. L-amino acids are used to make proteins, but D-amino acids are made in bacteria and used in the context of cell walls and natural antibiotics.


Proteins made by ribosomes (from amino acids attached to tRNA by tRNA-synthetases) use L-amino acids exclusively. The tRNA-synthetases are highly specific (including stereo specific), and they don't link tRNA to D-amino acids. It helps that there are very little D-amino acids made in a typical cell. Why one form was chosen over the other is probably luck again. Why all amino acids have the same chirality at the alpha carbon is more intriguing. Some are made from the same precursor, so that will contribute. Right-handed alpha helices require that the amino acids in them be L-amino acids. If proteins had a mixture of L- and D-amino acids (e.g. all alanines are D-alanines but all aspartates are L-aspartate), alpha helices would be more constrained in the possible sequences, and some of them would be left-handed.

All other molecules

Most steps in the synthesis of biomolecules are catalyzed by enzymes. Enzymes, as chiral catalysts that have lots of interactions with reactants, are often highly stereospecific. So the presence or absence of enzymes catalyzing certain reactions largely determines which products are made, and there is no additional cost of making a chiral product from non-chiral precursors (very different from a typical lab synthesis).

| improve this answer | |

Enzymes are very specific for the reaction to enantiomers. For certain products you have only one enantiomer in nature.

It may be the case that there is just one enantiomers which can react with an enzyme because of steric hindrance. But it is also possible that a racemic mixture can occur in fermentation products. So there is no general answer.

The biochemical reaction of two enantiomers can be very different in the human body. For example the contergan / thalidomid can be indicing sleep in the one form and in the other form can cause birth defects.

| improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Other than that the answer is a bit short, it is a good answer for saying that enzymes are stereo-specific catalysts, and that in context of the human body, enantiomers can have very different properties (because proteins bind with stereospecificity). As an aside, thalidomide unfortunately racemizes in the body, so administering a single enantiomer instead of the mixture still causes birth defects. $\endgroup$ – Karsten Theis Jul 16 '19 at 18:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.