1
$\begingroup$

I have already read Is adsorption exothermic, and if so, why? but it didn't answered my query.

To illustrate, let's take a hypothetical vacuum space. In that space, there is a solid and a gas, the gas is getting adsorbed over the solid. In that case, if we'll use momentum conservation, we'll get that the net kinetic energy of system has increased due to positive work done by the internal forces, but heat exchanged from system to surrounding or vice-versa is zero( as there is no outside interaction present. Therefore, dU>0 as U is sum of kinetic and potential energy of system( note that I haven't made the internal force as due to a field with a assigned potential function). We know dH=dU+PdV for processes in which the pressure outside the system is constant( which we have assumed). Therefore, as dV=0( because I had taken a fixed volume of space), therefore dH>0. But in books it is written dH due to adsorption is negative. Also, if I had assigned a potential function for internal forces, what change would have taken place? Please help me out.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In effect, you discuss a system where gas molecules don't interact with walls except for elastic collisions. In such a system, indeed, adsorption won't be exothermic (and consequently, won't happen at all). $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 10, 2019 at 7:53
  • $\begingroup$ In what case, will it be exothermic?( I mean what kind of interaction with wall, like you specify is required)? and what is the change if I introduced potential energy for the internal forces? $\endgroup$
    – MRG
    Commented Apr 10, 2019 at 8:05
  • $\begingroup$ An attractive interaction, of course. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 10, 2019 at 8:06

2 Answers 2

3
$\begingroup$

I will point out another equation:

$$\mathrm{d}G = \mathrm{d}H - T\,\mathrm{d}S$$

For adsorption $\mathrm{d}S<0$, as molecules go more organized.

Therefore also $\mathrm{d}H < 0$ must be true, otherwise $\mathrm{d}G < 0$, needed for a spontaneous process, would not be achieved.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Its ok but my question why enthalpy is negative according to my model and your answer is justifying enthalpy must negative for adsorption being spontaneous but not how exactly it is. $\endgroup$
    – MRG
    Commented Apr 10, 2019 at 15:16
  • $\begingroup$ For the same reason like the condensation from gaseous phase, or a cation binding an electron. The energy is released by the bonding. $\endgroup$
    – Poutnik
    Commented Apr 10, 2019 at 15:24
  • $\begingroup$ You have deliberately denied for the system to be in equilibrium with the surrounding, so the dH=0 by principle. $\endgroup$
    – Poutnik
    Commented Apr 10, 2019 at 16:02
1
$\begingroup$

Your mistake is in saying that the heat exchanged is zero. When we talk about a reaction being exothermic, it is based on the condition that the initial and final temperatures of the system are equal, and that, to achieve this, we exchange whatever amount of heat that is necessary.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.