10
$\begingroup$

I have tried for hours to calculate the commutator of angular momentum in the differential form, but I cannot get the correct answer. This is my first experience with actually checking if two operators commutes, so there may be some beginner's misunderstandings that causes the problem.

I know from my textbook the correct answer is:

$$ [\hat{L}_x,\hat{L}_y] = \frac{\hbar}{\mathrm{i}}\hat{L}_z = \frac{\hbar}{\mathrm{i}} \left( x \frac{\partial}{\partial y} - y \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \right) $$

The angular momenta are defined as

$$ \hat{L}_x = y \frac{\partial}{\partial z} - z \frac{\partial}{\partial y} \\ \hat{L}_y = z \frac{\partial}{\partial x} - x \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \\ \hat{L}_z = x \frac{\partial}{\partial y} - y \frac{\partial}{\partial x} $$

Sets up the commutator expression, and writes it out:

$$ [\hat{L}_x,\hat{L}_y] = \left[ y \frac{\partial}{\partial z} - z \frac{\partial}{\partial y} , z \frac{\partial}{\partial x} - x \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \right] $$

From what I assume is a well-known algebraic rule for handling commutators, I get the following:

$$ \left[y \frac{\hbar}{\mathrm{i}} \frac{\partial}{\partial z}, z \frac{\hbar}{\mathrm{i}} \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \right] - \left[y \frac{\hbar}{\mathrm{i}} \frac{\partial}{\partial z}, x \frac{\hbar}{\mathrm{i}} \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \right] - \left[z \frac{\hbar}{\mathrm{i}} \frac{\partial}{\partial y}, z \frac{\hbar}{\mathrm{i}} \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \right] + \left[z \frac{\hbar}{\mathrm{i}} \frac{\partial}{\partial y}, x \frac{\hbar}{\mathrm{i}} \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \right] $$

It was straight forward to find that the two middle terms commute, i.e. they equal zero. Hence, we are left with:

$$ \left[y \frac{\hbar}{\mathrm{i}} \frac{\partial}{\partial z}, z \frac{\hbar}{\mathrm{i}} \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \right] + \left[z \frac{\hbar}{\mathrm{i}} \frac{\partial}{\partial y}, x \frac{\hbar}{\mathrm{i}} \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \right] \tag{1} $$

Upon evaluating these terms, I let them act on a function $ \psi $. Looking at the first term: First I factored the complex fraction out. Then I wrote out the commutator and let each differential fraction act on $ \psi $:

$$ \frac{\hbar}{\mathrm{i}} \left(y \frac{\partial \psi z}{\partial z} \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x} - yz \frac{\partial \psi }{\partial x} \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial z} \right) $$

The y in the second term above can be factored out from the differentials, because the differential is not done with respect to y. In the first term, however, the z must be differentiated along with psi by using the product rule. Doing this, and cancelling equal terms of opposite sign, yields:

$$ \frac{\hbar}{\mathrm{i}} y \psi \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x} $$

Repeating this calculation for the second term in equation $(1)$ yields

$$ -\frac{\hbar}{\mathrm{i}} x \psi \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial y} $$

Substituting into $(1)$ yields

$$ [\hat{L}_x,\hat{L}_y] \psi = \frac{\hbar}{\mathrm{i}} \left( y \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x} - x \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial y} \right) \psi $$

Now, comparing with the correct answer:

i) My signs are opposite of what they should be

ii) More importantly, I have a $ \psi $ in the differentials which should not be there. My question is, "why, and how do I rid my answer of it?".

I hope I have sufficiently showed what I have done. I have checked my notes several times, and I cannot get rid of those extra psi's in my answer.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

8
$\begingroup$

Your problem with the sign stems from two things: Firstly, you use a wrong equation for the commutator $[\hat{L}_x,\hat{L}_y]$ - your prefactor is wrong by a minus sign: The correct equation (see here) is

\begin{equation} [\hat{L}_x,\hat{L}_y] = i \hbar \hat{L}_z \end{equation}

Secondly, your equations for the angular momentum operators are slightly wrong because you leave out the prefactor $\frac{\hbar}{i}$ in them, although you use the correct versions in your equation [1]. So, substituting the differential operator expression for $\hat{L}_z$

\begin{equation} \hat{L}_z = \frac{\hbar}{i} \left( x \frac{\partial}{\partial y} - y \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \right) \end{equation}

into the commutator equation you should get:

\begin{equation} [\hat{L}_x,\hat{L}_y] = i \hbar \frac{\hbar}{i} \left( x \frac{\partial}{\partial y} - y \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \right) = \hbar^{2} \left( x \frac{\partial}{\partial y} - y \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \right) \end{equation}

As for your problem with the additional $\psi$: Everything is fine until you let equation [1] act on a wavefunction $\psi$.

\begin{equation} [\hat{L}_x,\hat{L}_y] \psi = \left( \left[y \frac{\hbar}{i} \frac{\partial}{\partial z}, z \frac{\hbar}{i} \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \right] + \left[z \frac{\hbar}{i} \frac{\partial}{\partial y}, x \frac{\hbar}{i} \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \right] \right) \psi \end{equation}

You seem to make the following mistake which then leads to the appearance of an additional $\psi$ in your equations: When you let the commutator $ [\hat{A},\hat{B}]$ act on a wavefunction $\psi$ you did the following

\begin{equation} [\hat{A},\hat{B}] \psi = \hat{A} \psi \hat{B} \psi - \hat{B}\psi \hat{A}\psi \qquad \qquad \text{(wrong)} \end{equation}

which is incorrect. The correct way to do this is

\begin{equation} [\hat{A},\hat{B}] \psi = \hat{A} \hat{B} \psi - \hat{B} \hat{A}\psi \qquad \qquad \text{(correct)} \end{equation}

where $\hat{A} \hat{B} \psi$ means that first $\hat{B}$ acts on $\psi$ and only then $\hat{A}$ acts on the result. So, in the case at hand this leads to

\begin{align} \left[y \frac{\hbar}{i} \frac{\partial}{\partial z}, z \frac{\hbar}{i} \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \right] \psi &= \underbrace{\left(\frac{\hbar}{i}\right)^{2}}_{= \, -\hbar^{2}} \Biggl( \underbrace{ y \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \biggl( z \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x} \biggr)}_{= \, y \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x} + yz \frac{\partial^{2} \psi}{\partial z \partial x}} - z y \frac{\partial^{2} \psi}{\partial x \partial z} \Biggr) \\ &= -\hbar^{2} y \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x} \end{align}

and

\begin{align} \left[z \frac{\hbar}{i} \frac{\partial}{\partial y}, x \frac{\hbar}{i} \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \right] \psi &= -\hbar^{2} \Biggl( z x \frac{\partial^{2} \psi}{\partial y \partial z} - \underbrace{ x \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \biggl( z \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial y} \biggr)}_{= \, x \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial y} + xz \frac{\partial^{2} \psi}{\partial z \partial y}} \Biggr) \\ &= \hbar^{2} x \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial y} \end{align}

If you substitute these equations into the commutator equation you get

\begin{equation} [\hat{L}_x,\hat{L}_y] \psi = \hbar^{2} \left(x \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial y} - y \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x} \right) \end{equation}

which is exactly the result you should expect.

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.