4
$\begingroup$

What product is formed when curium-226 undergoes alpha decay?

Curium has atomic number 96. Since alpha decay decreases the number of protons and neutrons by 2, the product formed has atomic number 94 and atomic mass 222, thus the product is plutonium-222. However this was not an answer choice. The only answer choices were isotopes of radon, radium, and thorium. Either I don't know how to do a very simple question, or there are alternative representations of radioactive isotopes that I don't know about.

I would like to determine, if the question itself is wrong or if I am making a mistake.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ curium-226? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotopes_of_curium $\endgroup$
    – user15489
    Commented Apr 15, 2015 at 19:58
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Are you sure that the question wasn't about $\ce{^{226}Ra}$, which would decay to $\ce{^{222}Rn}$? $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 15, 2015 at 20:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ curium-226 isn't known and even if it was it would undergo rather beta - decay $\endgroup$
    – Mithoron
    Commented Apr 15, 2015 at 21:49

2 Answers 2

12
$\begingroup$

The question is flawed (possibly a misprint), your reasoning is sound (given the information provided to you).

Curium-226 does not exist, according to the Web Elements page on the isotopes of curium, the 'smallest' isotope is curium-240, which undergoes $\alpha$ decay to become plutonium-236.

$$\ce{^{240}_{96}Cm -> ^{236}_{94}Pu + ^{4}_{2}\alpha}$$

The most likely candidate of what the question should have been asking about is radium-226 decaying to radon-222,

$$\ce{^{226}_{88}Ra -> ^{222}_{86}Rn + ^{4}_{2}\alpha}$$

which is part of the uranium-series decay chain:

enter image description here

This is the most likely scenario, as the smallest isotope of thorium is thorium-227 (WebElements) and for radium, it is radium-223 (WebElements), both have too high a mass for anything with an atomic mass of 226 to directly decay into by alpha decay (as per the question).

$\endgroup$
0
1
$\begingroup$

In all likelihood they mistyped; the given isotope should have been called radium-226 and then, of course, it would decay to radon-222.

Curium is named for a scientist who discovered another radioactive element, but the element she actually discovered is named radium. Thus Madame Curie's name was misapplied. Radium-226 would be both consistent with the given choices and much more physically realistic.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.