I think what OP need is the derivation of the equation $(1)$ in the question (as indicated in the OP's comment, "an anyone help me with the derivation of the first one").
The first part of this derivation, the formula for the rate constant $k$ for the first order reaction, is done in the last part of Chemistry student's answer, and hence I'd not repeat it. Thus,
$$[\ce{A}]_t = [\ce{A}]_0\,\mathrm e^{-kt}\tag{3}$$
Or when the rearrangement of the equation $(3)$ gives:
$$ -kt = \ln\frac{[\ce{A}]_t}{[\ce{A}]_0}$$
$$ \implies kt = \ln\frac{[\ce{A}]_0 }{[\ce{A}]_t} \tag{2}$$
In equations $(2) \ \& \ (3)$, $[\ce{A}]_0$ is the initial concentration and $[\ce{A}]_{t}$ is the concentration at time $t$. If $t_{1/2}$ is the half-life and $[\ce{A}]_{t_{1/2}}$ is the concentration at half-life, we can rewrite the equation $(2)$ as:
$$ kt_{1/2} = \ln\frac{[\ce{A}]_0 }{[\ce{A}]_{t_{1/2}}} \tag{4}$$
Actually, $[\ce{A}]_{t_{1/2}}$ is $\frac{1}{2}[\ce{A}]_0$, and therefore, $[\ce{A}]_{t_{1/2}}$ can be written as $[\ce{A}]_0 - [\ce{A}]_{t_{1/2}}$. Substituting $[\ce{A}]_{t_{1/2}} = [\ce{A}]_0 - [\ce{A}]_{t_{1/2}}$ in the equation $(4)$, you get:
$$ kt_{1/2} = \ln\frac{[\ce{A}]_0 }{[\ce{A}]_0 - [\ce{A}]_{t_{1/2}}} \tag{5}$$
Applying $\ln x = 2.303 \log x$ in the equation $(5)$ and rearranging it to get $k$, we finally get:
$$ k = \frac{2.303}{t_{1/2}} \log \frac{[\ce{A}]_0 }{[\ce{A}]_0 - [\ce{A}]_{t_{1/2}}} \tag{6}$$
As evident and shown by others, OP's lecturer mentioned formula has two errors: one is making the $\log$ function negative, and the other is converting $\ln x$ to $\log 2.0303 x$, which is incorrect:
$$\ln x = \log_e x = \frac{\log_{10} x}{\log_{10} e} = \frac{\log_{10} x}{\frac{\log_{e} e}{{\log_{e} 10} }} = (\log_{10} x)(\log_{e} 10) = 2.303\log_{10} x$$
Thus, the equation $(6)$ is the most accurate equation in that regards.