Timeline for Comparison of rate of dehydration of primary, secondary & tertiary alcohols on cyclohexane
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 25, 2018 at 8:19 | history | edited | Gaurang Tandon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
slight clean up
|
Feb 16, 2017 at 6:17 | vote | accept | Yashas | ||
S Feb 11, 2017 at 7:06 | history | bounty ended | Yashas | ||
S Feb 11, 2017 at 7:06 | history | notice removed | Yashas | ||
Feb 5, 2017 at 14:36 | answer | added | user16347 | timeline score: 4 | |
Feb 5, 2017 at 12:07 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackChemistry/status/828213359828987904 | ||
S Feb 5, 2017 at 9:23 | history | bounty started | Yashas | ||
S Feb 5, 2017 at 9:23 | history | notice added | Yashas | Draw attention | |
S Feb 5, 2017 at 9:07 | history | suggested | Don_S |
Added 'homework' tag.
|
|
Feb 5, 2017 at 8:49 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Feb 5, 2017 at 9:07 | |||||
Feb 5, 2017 at 8:33 | history | edited | airhuff | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added MathJax formatting.
|
Apr 2, 2016 at 4:49 | comment | added | Yashas | P gets dehydrated via E2 mechanism? Carbocation isn't formed. Now its even more confusing, if it goes through E1 mechanism it will form an allylic carbocation. How do I now decide if it would undergo E1 or E2 elimination? | |
Apr 1, 2016 at 19:21 | comment | added | Jannis Andreska | Note that P can also form an allylic carbocation after protonation of OH group and subsequent loss of water. | |
Apr 1, 2016 at 13:06 | history | asked | Yashas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |