No one had "answered" the question, so I was attempting to note that @Nicolau Saker Neto basically had answered it, and provide further resources to back up the explanation. How should I approach this in the future?

So would it have been better as a comment? It was more of a "here's where to learn more" than a full-out explanation. It is, in fact, complicated, and a little post here, even attempting to summarized the papers, would hardly do it justice.