1
$\begingroup$

So I recognise what an electrophile and a nucleophile is, but not all mechanisms (that I know of at least) have one species substituting or adding. For example, propanone added to NaBH$_4$ has an initial step of a hydride (nucleophilic addition), and then a H$^+$ being added to an O$^-$ (electrophilic addition).

I'm a bit wary of this example as the second step doesn't involve a carbon. So, another example would be the addition of HBr to ethene. The first step has the addition of H$^{\delta+}$ (electrophile) and then Br$^{-}$ being added as a nucleophile.

This website offers a solution by specifying that the rate determining step takes precedence, but I can't find anything to corroborate this

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ so what exactly is your doubt, is it like identifying which step occurs first or whether it is entirely an SN or EN mechanism reaction ? $\endgroup$
    – PSR_123
    Commented Jun 5, 2022 at 17:54
  • $\begingroup$ The latter; (The site suggest it's to do with the rate determining step) $\endgroup$
    – yolo
    Commented Jun 5, 2022 at 18:09
  • $\begingroup$ in the end it is the rate determining step and stability of intermediates formed which decides whether an SN or EN reaction occurs. Eg : in a tertiary halide E1 is most preferred, followed by SN1 and SN2 and E2 are almost negligible. $\endgroup$
    – PSR_123
    Commented Jun 5, 2022 at 18:14
  • $\begingroup$ @PSR_123. Thanks. This answers my question $\endgroup$
    – yolo
    Commented Jun 5, 2022 at 19:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You know the difference between addition and substitution. Nucleophilic/electrophilic reactions are similar to redox reactions with reapect to reagents involve. There is always a reduction reaction when oxidation invoved. Similarly, there is always nucleophilic reaction when electrophilic reaction involved. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 5, 2022 at 22:58

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Any reaction that is either a nucleophilic or an electrophilic addition/substitution is in fact both a nucleophilic and an electrophilic addition/substitution. Whatever a nucleophile combines with can also be called an electrophile that attacks the nucleophile; textbooks just adopt a single perspective.

We also have examples where the same reagent is both an electrophile and a nucleophile to different parts of the "substrate". Grignard reactions, in which the Grignard reagent has both a nucleophilic carbon atom and an electrophilic magnesium atom, are one such example.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.