3
$\begingroup$

I have a question regarding the calculation of the $G$-matrix in the classic "Molecular vibrations" textbook by Wilson (1955, McGraw Hill).

On page 63 it gives an example for the calculation of an off-diagonal term coupling stretching with bending internal coordinates. Unfortunately I get a slightly different result when calculating it by hand.

Assume a non-linear triatomic molecule. Atoms 1 and 2 are on the outside, atom 3 is in the middle.

$s_1$ is the bond between Atoms 1 and 3, $s_2$ is the bond between Atoms 2 and 3, $s_3$ is the angle between atoms 1, 2, and 3.

The $s$-vectors are (page 63) given by:

Bond between Atom 1 and 3: $$ \vec{s}_{11} = \vec{e}_{31} $$ $$ \vec{s}_{13} = -\vec{e}_{31} $$ $$ \vec{s}_{12} = 0 $$ Bond between Atom 2 and 3: $$ \vec{s}_{21} = 0 $$ $$ \vec{s}_{23} = \vec{e}_{32} $$ $$ \vec{s}_{22} = -\vec{e}_{32} $$ Angle over Atoms 1, 3, and 2: $$ \vec{s}_{31} = \frac{\cos(\phi) \vec{e_{31}} - \vec{e}_{32}}{r_{31} \sin(\phi)} $$ $$ \vec{s}_{32} = \frac{\cos(\phi) \vec{e_{32}} - \vec{e}_{31}}{r_{32} \sin(\phi)} $$ $$ \vec{s}_{33} = \frac{ (r_{31} - r_{32} \cos(\phi))\vec{e}_{31} + (r_{32} - r_{31} \cos(\phi))\vec{e}_{32} } {r_{31} r_{32} \sin(\phi)} $$ If I calculate $G_{13}$ I get: $$ G_{13} = \mu_1 \vec{s}_{1, 1} \cdot \vec{s}_{3, 1} + \mu_2 \vec{s}_{1, 2} \cdot \vec{s}_{3, 2} + \mu_3 \vec{s}_{1, 3} \cdot \vec{s}_{3, 3} $$ $$ = \mu_1 \vec{e}_{31} \cdot \frac{\cos(\phi) \vec{e_{31}} - \vec{e}_{32}}{r_{31} \sin(\phi)} - \mu_3 \vec{e}_{31} \cdot \frac{ (r_{31} - r_{32} \cos(\phi))\vec{e}_{31} + (r_{32} - r_{31} \cos(\phi))\vec{e}_{32} } {r_{31} r_{32} \sin(\phi)} $$ (EDIT: in the following equality I wrongly assumed $\vec{e}_{31} \cdot \vec{e}_{32} = 0$) $$ = \mu_1 \frac{\cos(\phi)}{r_{31} \sin(\phi)} + \mu_3 \cdot \frac{ (r_{32} \cos(\phi) - r_{31}) } {r_{31} r_{32} \sin(\phi)} $$ $$ = \mu_1 \frac{\cos(\phi)}{r_{31} \sin(\phi)} + \frac{\mu_3 \cos(\phi)}{r_{31} \sin(\phi)} - \frac{\mu_3}{r_{32} \sin(\phi)} $$ $$ = (\mu_1 + \mu_3) \frac{\cos(\phi)}{r_{31} \sin(\phi)} - \frac{ \mu_3 } {r_{32} \sin(\phi)} $$

The result in the book is instead: $$ G_{13} = -\frac{\mu_3 \sin(\phi) }{ r_{32} } $$

What am I doing wrong?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

My error was that I read the $$\vec{e}_{ij}$$ vectors as if they were canonical vectors. Especially I implicitly assumed that $$\vec{e}_{31} \cdot \vec{e}_{32} = 0$$ Which is of course wrong. If one inserts $$\vec{e}_{31} \cdot \vec{e}_{32} = \cos(\phi)$$ the correct expression is obtained.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.