According to the manual of the newzmat
utility of Gaussian 16, it accepts unadorned Cartesian coordinates (G16 online manual). The format you have posted is actually (simple) xmol
. This means the first line denotes the number of atoms, the second line denotes a comment, and both need to be skipped.
Therefore your file should look like this:
C 0.539202 -0.539202 1.933833
C -0.539202 0.539202 1.933833
H 1.536064 -0.098299 1.932264
H 0.459532 -1.174264 2.816008
H 0.456405 -1.179449 1.055941
H -1.536064 0.098299 1.932264
H -0.459532 1.174264 2.816008
H -0.456405 1.179449 1.055941
C 0.539202 0.539202 -1.933833
C -0.539202 -0.539202 -1.933833
H 1.179449 0.456405 -1.055941
H 1.174264 0.459532 -2.816008
H 0.098299 1.536064 -1.932264
H -1.174264 -0.459532 -2.816008
H -0.098299 -1.536064 -1.932264
H -1.179449 -0.456405 -1.055941
In Gaussian terms, a block of cartesian coordinates is also a z-matrix. Therefore you also need to tell Gaussian to rebuild it (-rebuildzmat
). This will likely fail on your input with an error:
Input z-matrix variables are not compatible with final structure.
If you allow rounding (-round
) it will work. The complete command is:
newzmat -ixyz -ozmat -round -rebuildzmat <input.xyz> <output.com>
The following file is produced (it is a valid Gaussian input file):
# HF/6-31G* Test
-- No Title Specified --
0,1
C
C,1,R2
H,1,R3,2,A3
H,1,R4,2,A4,3,D4,0
H,1,R5,2,A5,3,D5,0
H,2,R6,1,A6,3,D6,0
H,2,R7,1,A7,6,D7,0
H,2,R8,1,A8,6,D8,0
C,3,R9,1,A9,2,D9,0
C,9,R10,3,A10,1,D10,0
H,9,R11,3,A11,10,D11,0
H,9,R12,3,A12,10,D12,0
H,9,R13,3,A13,10,D13,0
H,10,R14,9,A14,3,D14,0
H,10,R15,9,A15,14,D15,0
H,10,R16,9,A16,14,D16,0
Variables:
R2=1.53
R3=1.09
R4=1.09
R5=1.09
R6=1.09
R7=1.09
R8=1.09
R9=4.04
R10=1.53
R11=1.09
R12=1.09
R13=1.09
R14=1.09
R15=1.09
R16=1.09
A3=111.
A4=111.
A5=111.
A6=111.
A7=111.
A8=111.
A9=81.
A10=94.
A11=22.
A12=128.
A13=104.
A14=111.
A15=111.
A16=111.
D4=120.
D5=-120.
D6=180.
D7=120.
D8=-120.
D9=-76.
D10=-21.
D11=-144.
D12=-120.
D13=113.
D14=167.
D15=120.
D16=-120.
1 2 1.000 3 1.000 4 1.000 5 1.000
2 1 1.000 6 1.000 7 1.000 8 1.000
3 1 1.000
4 1 1.000
5 1 1.000
6 2 1.000
7 2 1.000
8 2 1.000
9 10 1.000 11 1.000 12 1.000 13 1.000
10 9 1.000 14 1.000 15 1.000 16 1.000
11 9 1.000
12 9 1.000
13 9 1.000
14 10 1.000
15 10 1.000
16 10 1.000
Whether or not this z-matrix does actually fits the purpose you are needing it for, is a different question. For the most tasks, where z-matrices are the superior input, I recommend building it by hand.
newzmat
behaves similar. $\endgroup$