Skip to main content
edited tags
Source Link
orthocresol
  • 71.9k
  • 12
  • 249
  • 423

I read this sentence from thein a paper paper(J. Phys. Chem. A 2014, 118 (20), 3678–3687. DOI: 10.1021/jp502475e):

Calculations using Hartree–Fock theory systematically overestimated dipole moments and underestimate polarizabilities.

Is there any intuitive explanation that the HF approximation affects dipole moments and polarizabilities differently?

I read this sentence from the paper:

Calculations using Hartree–Fock theory systematically overestimated dipole moments and underestimate polarizabilities.

Is there any intuitive explanation that the HF approximation affects dipole moments and polarizabilities differently?

I read this sentence in a paper (J. Phys. Chem. A 2014, 118 (20), 3678–3687. DOI: 10.1021/jp502475e):

Calculations using Hartree–Fock theory systematically overestimated dipole moments and underestimate polarizabilities.

Is there any intuitive explanation that the HF approximation affects dipole moments and polarizabilities differently?

Tweeted twitter.com/StackChemistry/status/928792596369018881
Source Link
James LT
  • 977
  • 8
  • 23

Hartree-Fock dipole moment

I read this sentence from the paper:

Calculations using Hartree–Fock theory systematically overestimated dipole moments and underestimate polarizabilities.

Is there any intuitive explanation that the HF approximation affects dipole moments and polarizabilities differently?