Timeline for Why is the electron-nucleus attraction modelled with only electrostatic interactions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 1, 2017 at 2:50 | history | edited | orthocresol | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
rephrased
|
Jul 15, 2017 at 23:14 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackChemistry/status/886363260575899648 | ||
Jul 9, 2017 at 14:09 | answer | added | Pritt says Reinstate Monica | timeline score: 6 | |
Jul 9, 2017 at 13:20 | comment | added | user41033 | It's also relevant to note that the standard treatment of electrons around nuclei is static, and comes from solving the time-independent Schrödinger equations. The standard QM depiction of atoms is stationary (and delocalised). | |
Jul 9, 2017 at 12:14 | answer | added | juanrga | timeline score: 6 | |
Jul 9, 2017 at 0:48 | vote | accept | Abhinav Dhawan | ||
Jul 8, 2017 at 23:50 | answer | added | Wildcat | timeline score: 15 | |
Jul 8, 2017 at 18:49 | comment | added | paracetamol | Have a look at the formulation of Coulomb's law. Do you see anything there that would result in a change in the magnitude of force between charges had a charge been in (relative) motion with respect to the other? Even if the one of the charges move, it doesn't affect the magnitude of force between the two particles. People normally make a distinction between interactions involving charges at rest, and charges in motion...because the latter is associated with varying electric fields, which would produce a magnetic field as well ;) | |
Jul 8, 2017 at 17:43 | review | Close votes | |||
Jul 8, 2017 at 23:38 | |||||
Jul 8, 2017 at 14:20 | history | edited | Abhinav Dhawan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
Jul 8, 2017 at 14:13 | answer | added | khaverim | timeline score: 3 | |
S Jul 8, 2017 at 13:48 | history | suggested | Glorfindel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
thanks removed as per https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/2950/295232
|
Jul 8, 2017 at 13:47 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jul 8, 2017 at 13:48 | |||||
Jul 8, 2017 at 13:33 | review | First posts | |||
Jul 8, 2017 at 13:47 | |||||
Jul 8, 2017 at 13:23 | history | asked | Abhinav Dhawan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |