Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 1, 2017 at 2:50 history edited orthocresol CC BY-SA 3.0
rephrased
Jul 15, 2017 at 23:14 history tweeted twitter.com/StackChemistry/status/886363260575899648
Jul 9, 2017 at 14:09 answer added Pritt says Reinstate Monica timeline score: 6
Jul 9, 2017 at 13:20 comment added user41033 It's also relevant to note that the standard treatment of electrons around nuclei is static, and comes from solving the time-independent Schrödinger equations. The standard QM depiction of atoms is stationary (and delocalised).
Jul 9, 2017 at 12:14 answer added juanrga timeline score: 6
Jul 9, 2017 at 0:48 vote accept Abhinav Dhawan
Jul 8, 2017 at 23:50 answer added Wildcat timeline score: 15
Jul 8, 2017 at 18:49 comment added paracetamol Have a look at the formulation of Coulomb's law. Do you see anything there that would result in a change in the magnitude of force between charges had a charge been in (relative) motion with respect to the other? Even if the one of the charges move, it doesn't affect the magnitude of force between the two particles. People normally make a distinction between interactions involving charges at rest, and charges in motion...because the latter is associated with varying electric fields, which would produce a magnetic field as well ;)
Jul 8, 2017 at 17:43 review Close votes
Jul 8, 2017 at 23:38
Jul 8, 2017 at 14:20 history edited Abhinav Dhawan CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 1 character in body
Jul 8, 2017 at 14:13 answer added khaverim timeline score: 3
S Jul 8, 2017 at 13:48 history suggested Glorfindel CC BY-SA 3.0
thanks removed as per https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/2950/295232
Jul 8, 2017 at 13:47 review Suggested edits
S Jul 8, 2017 at 13:48
Jul 8, 2017 at 13:33 review First posts
Jul 8, 2017 at 13:47
Jul 8, 2017 at 13:23 history asked Abhinav Dhawan CC BY-SA 3.0