Timeline for Why are there peaks in electronegativities in d-block elements?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 2, 2017 at 23:18 | answer | added | Lug | timeline score: -4 | |
Oct 8, 2015 at 0:23 | answer | added | gsurfer04 | timeline score: 1 | |
Jul 5, 2015 at 8:19 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackChemistry/status/617608659829432320 | ||
Jul 5, 2015 at 2:19 | comment | added | user15489 | Good points - I have added these details into the revised question | |
Jul 5, 2015 at 2:10 | history | edited | user15489 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 984 characters in body
|
Jul 5, 2015 at 1:49 | history | undeleted | user15489 | ||
Jul 5, 2015 at 1:43 | history | deleted | user15489 | via Vote | |
Jul 5, 2015 at 1:39 | comment | added | pH13 - Yet another Philipp | at your link they say nearly at the end (below slater's rules), that at the time allred and rochow constructed this scale the values for the covalent radius were wrong. they gave also a corrected table | |
Jul 5, 2015 at 1:32 | comment | added | user15489 | @NicolauSakerNeto that could be part of an answer | |
Jul 5, 2015 at 1:27 | comment | added | Nicolau Saker Neto | Perhaps a question of more immediate concern before tackling the title question is, just how well-defined are the electronegativities for the transition metals? | |
Jul 5, 2015 at 1:20 | history | asked | user15489 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |