Skip to main content

Timeline for X[Y|Z] formulas

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 19, 2015 at 2:57 history edited Martin - マーチン CC BY-SA 3.0
corrected markup
Jan 18, 2015 at 17:39 comment added LDC3 @Self-teachingDavide Since $UO$ exists as a compound, then $UO_2^{2-}$ can also exist. webelements.com/compounds/uranium/uranium_oxide.html
Jan 18, 2015 at 16:41 answer added Fred Senese timeline score: 3
Jan 18, 2015 at 16:25 comment added M.A.R. Now that I think about it, I see that two brackets like this ][, if not awkward, would've looked way messier than a | . Maybe it was the author's or the publisher's attempt to make chemical formulas look a little bit neater.
Jan 18, 2015 at 16:15 comment added Self-teaching worker @MARamezani Thank you again! I've just found other similar formulas in Mottana-Crespi-Liborio's text: Cu[UO$_2$|PO$_4$]$_2\cdot$12H$_2$O for torbernite, K$_2$[(UO$_2$)|V$_2$O$_8$]$\cdot$3H$_2$O for carnotite... but UO$_2$ is cation UO$_2^{2+}$, not an anion. Therefore my initial supposition that the brackets contain anions was wrong...
Jan 18, 2015 at 15:24 comment added M.A.R. Maybe, and I say maybe, they wanted to demonstrate something like, for example, brochantite has $\ce{OH-}, \ce{SO4^{2-}}$ and copper.
Jan 18, 2015 at 14:16 comment added Self-teaching worker @MARamezani Thank you very much for the comment! I've found this particular formula in an Italian language book: A. Mottana, R. Crespi, G. Liborio, "Minerali e rocce" ('Minerals and rocks'), but I've found similar notations in several other books of earth sciences.
Jan 18, 2015 at 13:32 comment added M.A.R. I'm not sure but wikipedia has just written a normal formula for Brochantite: $\ce{Cu4SO4(OH)6}$. Could you give me some reference of where you saw that formula?
Jan 18, 2015 at 10:37 history asked Self-teaching worker CC BY-SA 3.0