Timeline for Correct structure of compound tetraiodine nonoxide
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 11, 2023 at 7:47 | comment | added | andselisk♦ | Why use Android phone — which is intended for content consumption — for content production and complain about the inconveniences it causes when someone points out typos and lack of proper formatting? Why not just get a laptop and stop torturing yourself (it's evident you are trying your best, but the platform fights you back) while doing tech writing? This problem of yours persist for at least three years, maybe it's the time for a change? | |
Sep 10, 2023 at 18:34 | vote | accept | Prince Nagar | ||
Sep 10, 2023 at 13:40 | history | edited | Oscar Lanzi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Bond angles.
|
Sep 10, 2023 at 11:20 | comment | added | Martin - マーチン♦ | Determination of the absorption cross-sections of higher order iodine oxides at 355 nm and 532 nm - Scientific Figure on ResearchGate. Available from: researchgate.net/figure/… [accessed 10 Sep, 2023] | |
Sep 10, 2023 at 10:59 | comment | added | Martin - マーチン♦ | Molecuke?! More like molecute... Anyway, I don't find the bent surprising at all. Iodate is pyramidal in shape. And that is an electronic effect. The twist might well be due to "steric repulsion", but that's also just an electronic effect. Think about biphenyls, even a proton causes a twist. Steric effects are generally explained wrong though. | |
Sep 10, 2023 at 10:43 | history | edited | Poutnik | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
small typo fix
|
Sep 10, 2023 at 10:37 | comment | added | Oscar Lanzi | Two questions. (1) Can you try again? (2) Is there a stylus for Android phones? | |
Sep 10, 2023 at 10:36 | history | edited | Oscar Lanzi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Modified in response to a comment
|
Sep 10, 2023 at 9:59 | history | answered | Oscar Lanzi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |