Timeline for Stability of beryllium isotopes
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 13, 2023 at 23:38 | history | edited | Melanie Shebel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
minor language, mechanics
|
May 13, 2023 at 19:12 | history | edited | Mithoron | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
don't add mobile links
|
May 13, 2023 at 17:57 | history | edited | Proscionexium | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added external links
|
May 12, 2023 at 2:08 | vote | accept | Proscionexium | ||
May 11, 2023 at 23:49 | answer | added | Oscar Lanzi | timeline score: 7 | |
May 11, 2023 at 17:36 | comment | added | Loong | Related: Why is tin-112 stable, but indium-112 radioactive? | |
May 11, 2023 at 17:32 | history | edited | Mithoron | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
May 11, 2023 at 13:22 | comment | added | Poutnik | Note that there is multiple monoisotopic elements, but near all are odd-proton count cases, that have max 2 stable isotopes (that is the rule), and one option is claimed by the lower energy isotope of its greedy even-proton count neighbors. Tc and Pm have double bad luck - both their stable candidates are stolen. | |
May 11, 2023 at 12:34 | history | edited | Mithoron | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 6 characters in body
|
May 11, 2023 at 8:07 | comment | added | Poutnik | Beryllium would have had 2 stable isotopes and beryllium-8 would have been the ideal candidate if two helium-4 nuclei had not been even better energetical choice. Note that there exists no stable nucleus with 5 or 8 nucleons. It creates a little trouble for massive stars how to fuse helium-4 in heavier elements. | |
May 11, 2023 at 7:42 | history | asked | Proscionexium | CC BY-SA 4.0 |