Skip to main content
added 14 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
paracetamol
  • 18.8k
  • 32
  • 107
  • 172

Why isdoes the acyclic to cyclic rearrangementcyclization of Glucose formedopen-chain glucose occur via the C5 hydroxyl group?

In converting glucose from its acyclic (open-chain) form to either cyclic form (alpha or beta) why is the C5 hydroxyl group used instead of the bottommostbottom-most hydroxyl group?

Also, are these structures considered isomers? All sources I've seen only say "form" or "representation."

Why is the acyclic to cyclic rearrangement of Glucose formed via the C5 hydroxyl group?

In converting glucose from its acyclic form to either cyclic form (alpha or beta) why is the C5 hydroxyl group used instead of the bottommost hydroxyl group?

Also, are these structures considered isomers? All sources I've seen only say "form" or "representation."

Why does the cyclization of open-chain glucose occur via the C5 hydroxyl group?

In converting glucose from its acyclic (open-chain) form to either cyclic form (alpha or beta) why is the C5 hydroxyl group used instead of the bottom-most hydroxyl group?

Also, are these structures considered isomers? All sources I've seen only say "form" or "representation."

added tags and beautified the title
Source Link

Glucose: Why is the acyclic -->to cyclic. Why rearrangement of Glucose formed via the C5 hydroxyl group?

In converting glucose from its acyclic form to either cyclic form (alpha or beta) why is the C5 hydroxyl group used instead of the bottommost hydroxyl group?

(Also Also, are these structures considered isomers? All sources I've seen only say "form" or "representation.")

Glucose: acyclic --> cyclic. Why the C5 hydroxyl group?

In converting glucose from its acyclic form to either cyclic form (alpha or beta) why is the C5 hydroxyl group used instead of the bottommost hydroxyl group?

(Also, are these structures considered isomers? All sources I've seen only say "form" or "representation.")

Why is the acyclic to cyclic rearrangement of Glucose formed via the C5 hydroxyl group?

In converting glucose from its acyclic form to either cyclic form (alpha or beta) why is the C5 hydroxyl group used instead of the bottommost hydroxyl group?

Also, are these structures considered isomers? All sources I've seen only say "form" or "representation."

Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackChemistry/status/478757723618557953
Source Link
halcyon
  • 1.1k
  • 1
  • 11
  • 29

Glucose: acyclic --> cyclic. Why the C5 hydroxyl group?

In converting glucose from its acyclic form to either cyclic form (alpha or beta) why is the C5 hydroxyl group used instead of the bottommost hydroxyl group?

(Also, are these structures considered isomers? All sources I've seen only say "form" or "representation.")