Timeline for Formyl chloride naming
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2019 at 13:44 | history | edited | Poutnik | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 4 characters in body; added 14 characters in body
|
| Dec 20, 2019 at 13:01 | history | edited | Poutnik | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 39 characters in body; added 33 characters in body
|
| Dec 20, 2019 at 12:52 | history | edited | Poutnik | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 24 characters in body
|
| Dec 20, 2019 at 12:45 | history | edited | Poutnik | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 276 characters in body; added 1 character in body
|
| Dec 20, 2019 at 8:19 | history | edited | Poutnik | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Dec 20, 2019 at 8:14 | history | edited | Poutnik | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Putting later comment to the answer and reformulated.; added 27 characters in body; edited body
|
| Dec 20, 2019 at 8:05 | comment | added | Jan | Only thanks to your answer did I notice that analysing formyl chloride as $\ce{CHO}+\ce{Cl}$ makes sense, too =D | |
| Dec 20, 2019 at 7:52 | comment | added | Poutnik | Technically, it is an aldehyde as well, as formyl is de facto an aldehyde group. But by naming conventions, both trivial and systematic, being a derivate of an acid replacing OH by Cl takes precedence. | |
| Dec 20, 2019 at 7:48 | comment | added | Equation_Charmer | Why cant I take CHO in formyl chloride as aldehyde? | |
| Dec 20, 2019 at 7:47 | vote | accept | Equation_Charmer | ||
| Dec 20, 2019 at 7:24 | history | answered | Poutnik | CC BY-SA 4.0 |