Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
It finally makes sense, thanks so much! By the way, I was just watching a Khan Academy video, and although Sal's no expert in the field, he makes the same remark about "cationization energy" at ~3:00 so this seems to be a common confusion: youtu.be/5CBs36jtZxY?t=3m
@MaxW Maybe what you were implying with your comment is that any time cationization occurs, anionization also occurs; however, is it possible for an electron to be removed from an atom without it being added to another atom and become a free electron? Or maybe what you were implying is that the energy required to add or remove an electron is the same?
The reason I ask the question is that I've found the concept confusing because "ionization" alone is ambiguous. I think cationization would be valuable information and immediately imply the direction of movement. The implication from the above comments is that my intuition is correct, so I appreciate the responses. Thanks!