Skip to main content
6 of 6
Commonmark migration

To further illustrate brilliant Jan's answer, here are the experimental crystallographic data for both structures; also notice that reduced form contains $\ce{[Co(CN)5O]}$ units tilted at about $45^\circ$ dihedral angle, whereas in oxidized form those are perfectly aligned:

  1. Oxidized form $\ce{[(CN)5CoO2Co(CN)5]^6-}$, $d(\ce{O-O}) = \pu{1.447 Å}$, ICSD#6091 [1]:
    $\color{#909090}{\Large\bullet}~\ce{C}$; $\color{#3050F8}{\Large\bullet}~\ce{N}$; $\color{#FF0D0D}{\Large\bullet}~\ce{O}$; $\color{#F090A0}{\Large\bullet}~\ce{Co}$. enter image description here

  2. Reduced form $\ce{[(CN)5CoO2Co(CN)5]^5-}$, $d(\ce{O-O}) = \pu{1.243 Å}$, ICSD#4093 [2]:
    $\color{#909090}{\Large\bullet}~\ce{C}$; $\color{#3050F8}{\Large\bullet}~\ce{N}$; $\color{#FF0D0D}{\Large\bullet}~\ce{O}$; $\color{#F090A0}{\Large\bullet}~\ce{Co}$. enter image description here

Bibliography

  1. Fronczek, F. R.; Schaefer, W. P. Inorganica Chimica Acta 1974, 9 (Supplement C), 143–151 DOI: 10.1016/S0020-1693(00)89896-5.
  2. Fronczek, F. R.; Schaefer, W. P.; Marsh, R. E. Inorg. Chem. 1975, 14 (3), 611–617 DOI: 10.1021/ic50145a035.
andselisk
  • 38.5k
  • 14
  • 133
  • 223