Skip to main content
Chemistry

Return to Answer

Added explanation from comment.
Source Link
edit approved Apr 25, 2018 at 5:10
Volker Siegel
edit approved Apr 25, 2018 at 5:10
Volker Siegel
  • 479
  • 4
  • 17

$\ce{CO2}$ into $\ce{CO + O2}$ is easier but you need a catalyst and about 1500C

http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/news/2008/january/03010801.asp

In short:
Fe3O2 is heated to 1500C driving off oxygen. The resulting FeO is moved to CO2 chamber where it absorbs oxygen from the CO2. Result is CO and cooled Fe3O2. Cycle repeats.

$\ce{CO2}$ into $\ce{CO + O2}$ is easier but you need a catalyst and about 1500C

http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/news/2008/january/03010801.asp

$\ce{CO2}$ into $\ce{CO + O2}$ is easier but you need a catalyst and about 1500C

http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/news/2008/january/03010801.asp

In short:
Fe3O2 is heated to 1500C driving off oxygen. The resulting FeO is moved to CO2 chamber where it absorbs oxygen from the CO2. Result is CO and cooled Fe3O2. Cycle repeats.

added 10 characters in body
Source Link
user15489
user15489

CO2$\ce{CO2}$ into CO + O2$\ce{CO + O2}$ is easier but you need a catalyst and about 1500deg C1500C

http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/news/2008/january/03010801.asp

CO2 into CO + O2 is easier but you need a catalyst and about 1500deg C

http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/news/2008/january/03010801.asp

$\ce{CO2}$ into $\ce{CO + O2}$ is easier but you need a catalyst and about 1500C

http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/news/2008/january/03010801.asp

Post Migrated Here from physics.stackexchange.com (revisions)
Source Link
Martin Beckett
Martin Beckett

CO2 into CO + O2 is easier but you need a catalyst and about 1500deg C

http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/news/2008/january/03010801.asp