Timeline for What is the inert pair effect?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2019 at 10:02 | comment | added | pranjal verma | @Philipp But in wave mechanics electron is not supposed to be object so why are we assuming electron to behave as a planet and spin? | |
| May 28, 2018 at 18:43 | comment | added | Soham | @Philipp I am not an expert to judge the correctness as gsurfero4 did but your answer is absolutely amazing. Such good explanation is nowhere available! | |
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:57 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://chemistry.stackexchange.com/ with https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jan 7, 2017 at 14:24 | history | edited | orthocresol | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 29 characters in body
|
| Feb 16, 2016 at 20:29 | comment | added | Philipp | For reference: physics.stackexchange.com/q/1686/7768 | |
| Feb 16, 2016 at 20:29 | comment | added | Philipp | @gsurfer04 Could you elaborate on what you mean by your second sentence, because the part "the energies associated with it are not" needs more explanation. If you are talking about rest mass, which indeed would be a constant, then your argument is correct. I know that the whole argument that mass increases with speed is not the most correct way of expressing what happens as the term mass used here is not identical with the rest mass but I didn't want to dive into that discussion in my answer. Thanks for raising awareness of this issue. | |
| Feb 16, 2016 at 19:46 | comment | added | gsurfer04 | Please don't refer to relativistic mass. Mass is invariant, the energies associated with it are not. | |
| Feb 16, 2016 at 17:38 | history | edited | orthocresol | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Mar 2, 2014 at 3:41 | history | edited | Philipp | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed spelling
|
| Feb 27, 2014 at 18:55 | history | answered | Philipp | CC BY-SA 3.0 |