Timeline for Chemical Kinetics / Rate Question -- Error in Textbook Question/Answer?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 13, 2017 at 10:46 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Nov 13, 2017 at 10:36 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Oct 14, 2017 at 10:09 | answer | added | logical x 2 | timeline score: 2 | |
Oct 14, 2017 at 10:00 | comment | added | logical x 2 | There are so many other things wrong with this table. Obviously, the table suggests that the rate is constant over time. Therefore, it has to be a zeroth order kinetic anyway. Or do they mean the Rate at some point in time, e.g. initial rate. Absurd excercise. | |
Oct 14, 2017 at 9:57 | comment | added | logical x 2 | Another sign that the table is wrong, is that [XH4] and [O2] in entries 3 and 4 are the same but still have a different rate. Thus, the same input gives two different outputs: The rate is not a function of the concentration, and the question is unsolvable. | |
Oct 13, 2017 at 9:19 | history | edited | Jan |
edited tags
|
|
S Oct 13, 2017 at 8:47 | history | suggested | mhchem | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Typography
|
Oct 13, 2017 at 7:53 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Oct 13, 2017 at 8:47 | |||||
Oct 13, 2017 at 3:38 | comment | added | Tyberius♦ | From what I can see the table looks very messed up, so I think the question is just wrong. The answer you found that says the O2 concentration is increased by 4, while that doesn't occur anywhere in the table, is a big sign that this question is wrong. | |
Oct 13, 2017 at 3:02 | review | First posts | |||
Oct 13, 2017 at 3:06 | |||||
Oct 13, 2017 at 3:01 | history | asked | user53300 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |