Timeline for The last element's atomic number
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 3 at 14:38 | comment | added | Jon Custer | A fully stripped nucleus is still an element. But the limits keep being tested, and nuclear models are complicated for high Z elements. Maybe there is an island of stability, maybe not. And very weird nuclei may fleetingly exist in supernovae. Glen Seaborg would approve of this question… | |
Nov 2 at 1:05 | comment | added | Mithoron | @PaulKolk Well, technically bismuth also decays, but extremally slowly. No one would say it means it's not an element. If decay time is too short for nucleus to capture a single electron... that's a different matter. | |
Nov 1 at 14:05 | review | Close votes | |||
Nov 6 at 3:07 | |||||
Nov 1 at 13:44 | comment | added | Paul Kolk | What kind of "chemical factors" ? Experimentally, bismuth, element number 83, is the last one within permissible radioactivity limit, IMO. Surprisingly, answers do not even mention this. Please make it clear how high radioactivity is permissible. | |
Dec 23, 2021 at 17:36 | vote | accept | Devgeet Patel | ||
Jul 24, 2021 at 21:54 | history | protected | orthocresol | ||
Jul 24, 2021 at 19:47 | answer | added | AC DeBlanc | timeline score: 2 | |
Jan 21, 2018 at 1:51 | answer | added | riemannium | timeline score: 4 | |
Jan 21, 2018 at 0:09 | answer | added | user57895 | timeline score: 7 | |
Jan 20, 2017 at 10:11 | answer | added | ashkan nomani | timeline score: -3 | |
Mar 4, 2014 at 1:32 | history | edited | Nicolau Saker Neto |
edited tags
|
|
Jan 28, 2014 at 23:55 | answer | added | Uncle Al | timeline score: 5 | |
Jan 28, 2014 at 14:20 | vote | accept | Devgeet Patel | ||
Jan 26, 2014 at 19:33 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackChemistry/status/427524656258883584 | ||
Jan 26, 2014 at 13:41 | answer | added | Nicolau Saker Neto | timeline score: 56 | |
Jan 26, 2014 at 12:52 | history | asked | Devgeet Patel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |