Skip to main content
added 77 characters in body
Source Link
Tyberius
  • 11.9k
  • 10
  • 45
  • 86

I'm basing my attempt at an answer off of Modern Quantum Chemistry by Szabo and Ostlund, p.119-122.

The general development of Hartree-Fock is done via functional variation of the ground state energy $E_0=\left<\psi_0\right|\!\hat{H}\!\left|\psi_0\right>$. At the end of this, we obtain the matrix form of a differential equation

$$ f\left|\chi_a\right> = \sum_{b\,=\,1}^N \epsilon_{ba}\left|\chi_b\right> $$

where $f$ is the Fock operator and the sum is over all $N$ occupied spin orbitals. By appropriate unitary transformation (that which diagonalizes the matrix $\epsilon$), we obtain the equation in its canonical form

$$ f\left|\chi_a'\right> = \epsilon_{a}\left|\chi_a'\right> $$

where the $\chi_a'$ are the canonical Hartree-Fock orbitals and the elements along the diagonal of $\epsilon$ are interpreted as molecular orbital energies.

My understanding of why it would be difficult to use Koopmans' theorem with other orbitals is that the canonical Hartree-Fock orbitals are unique in putting the above matrix equation in diagonal form. In the noncanonical forms, there isn't a clear value that could consideredof the orbital energy for a particular $\left|\chi_a''\right>$ (i.e., they don't return an eigenvalue when acted on by the Fock operator).

I'm basing my attempt at an answer off of Modern Quantum Chemistry by Szabo and Ostlund, p.119-122.

The general development of Hartree-Fock is done via functional variation of the ground state energy $E_0=\left<\psi_0\right|\!\hat{H}\!\left|\psi_0\right>$. At the end of this, we obtain the matrix form of a differential equation

$$ f\left|\chi_a\right> = \sum_{b\,=\,1}^N \epsilon_{ba}\left|\chi_b\right> $$

where $f$ is the Fock operator and the sum is over all $N$ occupied spin orbitals. By appropriate unitary transformation (that which diagonalizes the matrix $\epsilon$), we obtain the equation in its canonical form

$$ f\left|\chi_a'\right> = \epsilon_{a}\left|\chi_a'\right> $$

where the $\chi_a'$ are the canonical Hartree-Fock orbitals.

My understanding of why it would be difficult to use Koopmans' theorem with other orbitals is that the canonical Hartree-Fock orbitals are unique in putting the above matrix equation in diagonal form. In the noncanonical forms, there isn't a clear value that could considered the orbital energy for a particular $\left|\chi_a''\right>$ (i.e., they don't return an eigenvalue when acted on by the Fock operator).

I'm basing my attempt at an answer off of Modern Quantum Chemistry by Szabo and Ostlund, p.119-122.

The general development of Hartree-Fock is done via functional variation of the ground state energy $E_0=\left<\psi_0\right|\!\hat{H}\!\left|\psi_0\right>$. At the end of this, we obtain the matrix form of a differential equation

$$ f\left|\chi_a\right> = \sum_{b\,=\,1}^N \epsilon_{ba}\left|\chi_b\right> $$

where $f$ is the Fock operator and the sum is over all $N$ occupied spin orbitals. By appropriate unitary transformation (that which diagonalizes the matrix $\epsilon$), we obtain the equation in its canonical form

$$ f\left|\chi_a'\right> = \epsilon_{a}\left|\chi_a'\right> $$

where the $\chi_a'$ are the canonical Hartree-Fock orbitals and the elements along the diagonal of $\epsilon$ are interpreted as molecular orbital energies.

My understanding of why it would be difficult to use Koopmans' theorem with other orbitals is that the canonical Hartree-Fock orbitals are unique in putting the above matrix equation in diagonal form. In the noncanonical forms, there isn't a clear value of the orbital energy for a particular $\left|\chi_a''\right>$ (i.e., they don't return an eigenvalue when acted on by the Fock operator).

grammar
Source Link
Tyberius
  • 11.9k
  • 10
  • 45
  • 86

I'm basing my attempt at an answer off of Modern Quantum Chemistry by Szabo and Ostlund, p.119-122.

The general development of Hartree-Fock is done via functional variation of the ground state energy $E_0=\left<\psi_0\right|\!\hat{H}\!\left|\psi_0\right>$. At the end of this, we obtain the matrix form of a differential equation

$$ f\left|\chi_a\right> = \sum_{b\,=\,1}^N \epsilon_{ba}\left|\chi_b\right> $$

where $f$ is the Fock operator and the sum is over all $N$ occupied spin orbitals. By appropriate unitary transformation (that which diagonalizes the matrix $\epsilon$), we obtain the equation in its canonical form

$$ f\left|\chi_a'\right> = \epsilon_{a}\left|\chi_a'\right> $$

where the $\chi_a'$ are the canonical Hartree-Fock orbitals.

My understanding of why it would be difficult to use Koopman'sKoopmans' theorem with other orbitals is that the canonical Hartree-Fock orbitals are unique in putting the above matrix equation in diagonal form. In the noncanonical forms, there isn't a clear value that could considered the orbital energy for a particular $\left|\chi_a''\right>$ (i.e., they don't return an eigenvalue when acted on by the Fock operator).

I'm basing my attempt at an answer off of Modern Quantum Chemistry by Szabo and Ostlund, p.119-122.

The general development of Hartree-Fock is done via functional variation of the ground state energy $E_0=\left<\psi_0\right|\!\hat{H}\!\left|\psi_0\right>$. At the end of this, we obtain the matrix form of a differential equation

$$ f\left|\chi_a\right> = \sum_{b\,=\,1}^N \epsilon_{ba}\left|\chi_b\right> $$

where $f$ is the Fock operator and the sum is over all $N$ occupied spin orbitals. By appropriate unitary transformation (that which diagonalizes the matrix $\epsilon$), we obtain the equation in its canonical form

$$ f\left|\chi_a'\right> = \epsilon_{a}\left|\chi_a'\right> $$

where the $\chi_a'$ are the canonical Hartree-Fock orbitals.

My understanding of why it would be difficult to use Koopman's theorem with other orbitals is that the canonical Hartree-Fock orbitals are unique in putting the above matrix equation in diagonal form. In the noncanonical forms, there isn't a clear value that could considered the orbital energy for a particular $\left|\chi_a''\right>$ (i.e., they don't return an eigenvalue when acted on by the Fock operator).

I'm basing my attempt at an answer off of Modern Quantum Chemistry by Szabo and Ostlund, p.119-122.

The general development of Hartree-Fock is done via functional variation of the ground state energy $E_0=\left<\psi_0\right|\!\hat{H}\!\left|\psi_0\right>$. At the end of this, we obtain the matrix form of a differential equation

$$ f\left|\chi_a\right> = \sum_{b\,=\,1}^N \epsilon_{ba}\left|\chi_b\right> $$

where $f$ is the Fock operator and the sum is over all $N$ occupied spin orbitals. By appropriate unitary transformation (that which diagonalizes the matrix $\epsilon$), we obtain the equation in its canonical form

$$ f\left|\chi_a'\right> = \epsilon_{a}\left|\chi_a'\right> $$

where the $\chi_a'$ are the canonical Hartree-Fock orbitals.

My understanding of why it would be difficult to use Koopmans' theorem with other orbitals is that the canonical Hartree-Fock orbitals are unique in putting the above matrix equation in diagonal form. In the noncanonical forms, there isn't a clear value that could considered the orbital energy for a particular $\left|\chi_a''\right>$ (i.e., they don't return an eigenvalue when acted on by the Fock operator).

Add Google Books link, some MathJax tweaks; re-word the last paragraph
Source Link
hBy2Py
  • 17.5k
  • 3
  • 64
  • 112

I'm basing my attempt at an answer off of Modern Quantum Chemistry by Szabo and OstlundModern Quantum Chemistry by Szabo and Ostlund, p.119-122.

The general development of Hartree-Fock is done via functional variation of the ground state energy $E_0=\left<\psi_0|\hat{H}|\psi_0\right>$$E_0=\left<\psi_0\right|\!\hat{H}\!\left|\psi_0\right>$. At the end of this, we obtain the matrix form of a differential equation

$$ f\left|\chi_a\right> = \sum_{b=1}^N \epsilon_{ba}\left|\chi_b\right> $$$$ f\left|\chi_a\right> = \sum_{b\,=\,1}^N \epsilon_{ba}\left|\chi_b\right> $$

where $f$ is the Fock operator and the sum is over all $N$ occupied spin orbitals. By appropriate unitary transformation (that which diagonalizes the matrix $\epsilon$), we obtain the equation in its canonical form

$$ f\left|\chi_a'\right> = \epsilon_{a}\left|\chi_a'\right> $$

where the $\chi_a'$ are the canonical Hartree-Fock orbitals.

My understanding of why it would be difficult to use KoopmansKoopman's theorem with other orbitals is that the canonical Hartree-Fock orbitals are unique in putting the above matrix equation in canonicaldiagonal form. In the noncanonical forms, there isn't a clear value that could considered the orbital energy for a particular $\left|\chi_a\right>$$\left|\chi_a''\right>$ (i.e., they don't return an eigenvalue when acted on by the Fock operator).

I'm basing my attempt at an answer off of Modern Quantum Chemistry by Szabo and Ostlund, p.119-122.

The general development of Hartree-Fock is done via functional variation of the ground state energy $E_0=\left<\psi_0|\hat{H}|\psi_0\right>$. At the end of this, we obtain a differential equation

$$ f\left|\chi_a\right> = \sum_{b=1}^N \epsilon_{ba}\left|\chi_b\right> $$

where $f$ is the Fock operator and the sum is over all $N$ occupied spin orbitals. By appropriate unitary transformation (that which diagonalizes the matrix $\epsilon$), we obtain the equation in its canonical form

$$ f\left|\chi_a'\right> = \epsilon_{a}\left|\chi_a'\right> $$

where the $\chi_a'$ are the Hartree-Fock orbitals.

My understanding of why it would be difficult to use Koopmans theorem with other orbitals is that the Hartree-Fock orbitals are unique in putting the equation in canonical form. In the noncanonical forms, there isn't a clear value that could considered the orbital energy for a particular $\left|\chi_a\right>$ (i.e. they don't return an eigenvalue when acted on by the Fock operator).

I'm basing my attempt at an answer off of Modern Quantum Chemistry by Szabo and Ostlund, p.119-122.

The general development of Hartree-Fock is done via functional variation of the ground state energy $E_0=\left<\psi_0\right|\!\hat{H}\!\left|\psi_0\right>$. At the end of this, we obtain the matrix form of a differential equation

$$ f\left|\chi_a\right> = \sum_{b\,=\,1}^N \epsilon_{ba}\left|\chi_b\right> $$

where $f$ is the Fock operator and the sum is over all $N$ occupied spin orbitals. By appropriate unitary transformation (that which diagonalizes the matrix $\epsilon$), we obtain the equation in its canonical form

$$ f\left|\chi_a'\right> = \epsilon_{a}\left|\chi_a'\right> $$

where the $\chi_a'$ are the canonical Hartree-Fock orbitals.

My understanding of why it would be difficult to use Koopman's theorem with other orbitals is that the canonical Hartree-Fock orbitals are unique in putting the above matrix equation in diagonal form. In the noncanonical forms, there isn't a clear value that could considered the orbital energy for a particular $\left|\chi_a''\right>$ (i.e., they don't return an eigenvalue when acted on by the Fock operator).

Welcome to Chemistry.SE! Have some slightly better looking brakets. Also the guys name is actually Koopmans. And please don't link to pirated stuff.
Source Link
pentavalentcarbon
  • 7.5k
  • 6
  • 49
  • 79
Loading
Source Link
Tyberius
  • 11.9k
  • 10
  • 45
  • 86
Loading