Timeline for Why apart from when building atoms in the first place, the 3d is the lower energy orbital?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2017 at 22:08 | history | edited | andselisk♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 94 characters in body
|
| Sep 6, 2014 at 21:50 | answer | added | Coconut | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 12, 2014 at 12:34 | comment | added | Martin - マーチン♦ | It is also from the misconception that d-orbitals are actually necessary to build up the hyper-coordinated species. | |
| May 3, 2014 at 19:54 | comment | added | tschoppi | @F'x That's already halfway to an answer! Would you care to turn it into a full answer on its own? | |
| Sep 8, 2013 at 21:17 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackChemistry/status/376816578421346304 | ||
| Sep 4, 2013 at 7:34 | history | edited | F'x | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 26 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Sep 4, 2013 at 7:34 | comment | added | F'x | This is because the commonly taught method of building electronic configurations, by assuming that all atoms have the energetic diagram for their atomic orbitals, is not a valid hypothesis any more when you read the d block. So you can learn rule of thumbs, but the reality is that energy levels of polyelectronic atoms are much harder to understand (graduate-level quantum chemistry). Here's one link that may help | |
| Sep 4, 2013 at 1:00 | history | asked | user2246 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |