Timeline for Gaussian vs. Lorentz/Cauchy distributions for artificial broadening
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2016 at 19:52 | comment | added | Jordan Epstein | From the little bit I've learned, Lorentz would be the most accurate for a single broadening event but if you sample a population it would looks more like a Gaussian. That's what someone in my lab said at least... | |
| Sep 17, 2016 at 19:49 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Aug 18, 2016 at 7:37 | answer | added | porphyrin | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 18, 2016 at 6:33 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackChemistry/status/766161070121779200 | ||
| Aug 17, 2016 at 14:33 | comment | added | pH13 - Yet another Philipp | Shortly after posting I found this, which is at least related, if not the same chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/324/… ... but the answer is not enough for my taste. | |
| Aug 17, 2016 at 14:33 | history | asked | pH13 - Yet another Philipp | CC BY-SA 3.0 |