Timeline for Heating organic compound in a stream of nitrogen gas
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2016 at 14:39 | vote | accept | JM97 | ||
| Aug 16, 2016 at 18:44 | answer | added | Agriculturist | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 16, 2016 at 12:24 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackChemistry/status/765524660578619393 | ||
| Aug 16, 2016 at 6:54 | comment | added | Ivan Neretin | I guess it will. | |
| Aug 16, 2016 at 6:52 | comment | added | JM97 | @IvanNeretin Will red hot coke reduce all the other oxides like Nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides, and eventually form CO? | |
| Aug 16, 2016 at 6:49 | comment | added | Ivan Neretin | The procedure will work all right. See those "other gaseous products". We don't care in which form the oxygen evolves, nor do we have to. It will all be converted to $\ce{CO}$, no matter what. | |
| Aug 16, 2016 at 6:41 | comment | added | JM97 | @IvanNeretin Could you please refer other book which has same procedure? Could you also prove why it's wrong? | |
| Aug 16, 2016 at 6:38 | comment | added | Ivan Neretin | Then I believe the book is wrong on that one. | |
| Aug 16, 2016 at 6:20 | history | edited | JM97 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 86 characters in body
|
| Aug 16, 2016 at 6:19 | comment | added | JM97 | @IvanNeretin The book says o2 is evolved see the edited question. | |
| Aug 16, 2016 at 6:13 | comment | added | Ivan Neretin | I'd say none of the oxygen present in the compound will evolve as molecular oxygen. Nor does the book say that it will, BTW. | |
| Aug 16, 2016 at 5:28 | history | asked | JM97 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |