Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:57 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://chemistry.stackexchange.com/ with https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/
Nov 12, 2016 at 16:12 vote accept ParaH2
May 17, 2016 at 16:52 comment added ParaH2 I found how to do but for me your "answer" is not the answer of my question about how should I mix (and which ones) to obtain the diagram.
May 8, 2016 at 17:37 comment added ParaH2 Yes I followed them but as I said we still have not do it in class and so we must be able to do it without them. And I don't understand all your shortcut. At least I would like your answer to be only this short cut but with more details or images too because I have some troubles to understand english sometimes.
Apr 28, 2016 at 19:22 history edited Jan CC BY-SA 3.0
added 603 characters in body
Apr 28, 2016 at 19:18 comment added Jan It’s complex because I love being complex O:-) But did you follow the link to the other question (and answer)?
Apr 28, 2016 at 19:16 comment added ParaH2 So to make it more clear it is why for the third MO, the two s-orbital are not in opposition of phase like I did in my reasoning because their energy will be higher than at the beginning?
Apr 28, 2016 at 19:11 comment added ParaH2 I have not learnt anything about point group yet and I don't understand why your answer is so complex, what I was asking is (maybe it wasn't enough clear) is for the orbital $\ce{III}$ what are the steps to get the right answer and not what I did? I guess your answer must be clear for someone who has a lot of knowlegde about this but for me it is really hard sorry. For the moment I don't want to know exactly what all of them should look like just how step by step can I find the good shape of the third orbital :-) after I'll do more complex things ^^
Apr 28, 2016 at 18:15 history answered Jan CC BY-SA 3.0