Timeline for Number of stereoisomers of 1-(2-methylcyclohexyl)ethan-1-ol
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2016 at 4:42 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Jul 31, 2016 at 17:44 | history | edited | user7951 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
name added in order to improve search results
|
| Apr 28, 2016 at 2:45 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackChemistry/status/725516164684742656 | ||
| Apr 27, 2016 at 13:10 | history | edited | orthocresol | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 137 characters in body
|
| Apr 27, 2016 at 13:09 | answer | added | orthocresol | timeline score: 5 | |
| Apr 27, 2016 at 8:12 | comment | added | IT Tsoi | True, but that would not change the name of the compound regardless of whether the particular group in question takes an axial or Equatorial position. | |
| Apr 27, 2016 at 8:09 | comment | added | user14857 | But one could be above the plane and one below...there need not be a double bond | |
| Apr 27, 2016 at 8:09 | comment | added | IT Tsoi | Geometrical Isomerism doesn't apply in this case since there are no double bonds. | |
| Apr 27, 2016 at 7:45 | comment | added | user14857 | Can't there be geometrical isomerism ? | |
| Apr 27, 2016 at 7:36 | comment | added | IT Tsoi | I'm wondering this as well - the only other interpretation I can see is if you had to specify how many types of stereoisomers there are. That would give 2, because you'd have diastereomers and enantiomers but not meso compounds. | |
| Apr 27, 2016 at 6:43 | history | asked | user14857 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |