Timeline for Approximate magnetic susceptibility of these liquid propellants?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
16 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 21, 2021 at 5:30 | answer | added | agaitaarino | timeline score: 3 | |
Mar 16, 2019 at 23:42 | comment | added | uhoh | @matt_black if you look carefully you'll see I never called oxygen a fuel. I did however call it and all the rest propellants, which is the standard terminology in rocket-speak. There are some great videos in Is the Paramagnetism of Liquid Oxygen Ever Considered in Engine or Tank Design? and it's already helpful that you point out that the others propellants are likely to have much weaker responses to magnetic field than LOX, thanks! | |
Mar 16, 2019 at 21:22 | comment | added | matt_black | Liquid oxygen will be the only paramagnetic substance in this list (it has two unpaired electrons). The others are all diamagnetic. But oxygen is an oxidiser not a full and the others are all fuels. So is the question whether the oxidisers associated with the fuels are paramagnetic? | |
Mar 16, 2019 at 9:32 | history | edited | uhoh | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
Feb 21, 2018 at 8:22 | history | edited | uhoh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 303 characters in body
|
May 21, 2017 at 3:25 | history | edited | uhoh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 61 characters in body
|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://space.stackexchange.com/ with https://space.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:57 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://chemistry.stackexchange.com/ with https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Mar 7, 2016 at 22:40 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackChemistry/status/706972730860634114 | ||
Mar 7, 2016 at 13:03 | history | edited | uhoh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added update of Hydrogen information - I saw this question in the sidebar after so much editing has been done.
|
Mar 7, 2016 at 12:55 | history | edited | uhoh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added update of Hydrogen information - I saw this question in the sidebar after so much editing has been done.
|
Mar 7, 2016 at 12:39 | history | edited | uhoh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
thanks for the edits - I had to change"/mol" to "/kg" - had it written wrong (doesn't affect calculation)
|
Mar 7, 2016 at 12:06 | history | edited | Martin - マーチン♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
removed edit statement from the title, that is obvious from the history and the question gets a bump on the active tab
|
Mar 7, 2016 at 11:49 | history | edited | uhoh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 131 characters in body
|
Mar 7, 2016 at 11:27 | history | edited | uhoh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 718 characters in body
|
Mar 5, 2016 at 16:36 | history | asked | uhoh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |