Timeline for Why does carbon monoxide have a greater affinity for hemoglobin than oxygen?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 4, 2021 at 15:22 | comment | added | Yashwini | Is affinity of NO for haemoglobin even more than that of CO for haemoglobin? | |
S May 10, 2019 at 14:53 | history | suggested | David | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
replaced "crappy" by "poor".
|
May 10, 2019 at 12:52 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S May 10, 2019 at 14:53 | |||||
Sep 14, 2017 at 10:47 | history | edited | Jan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 112 characters in body
|
Jul 13, 2017 at 5:15 | vote | accept | bonCodigo | ||
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:57 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://chemistry.stackexchange.com/ with https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Feb 26, 2017 at 17:23 | history | bounty ended | orthocresol | ||
Feb 21, 2017 at 5:58 | comment | added | Martin - マーチン♦ | Since you refer to my orbitals: I have deduced the ability of CO being a sigma donor in this answer. You might find the MO scheme in there quite useful for your first part. I'd say a job well done, you deserve more attention for this! | |
Feb 12, 2017 at 22:11 | comment | added | orthocresol | Since I was curious, I tried to find a reference for the bent CO binding. Here it is: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1988, 85 (14), 5062–5066. And yes, the debate about Fe(II) vs. Fe(III) in oxyHb is not yet settled. This recent article on Hb is a really nice read, summarising a lot of the work that has been done in the area: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2015, 112 (43), 13123–13127. Feel free to include in your answer if you wish. | |
Feb 12, 2017 at 18:50 | history | edited | Jan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Why did nobody tell me the link was broken?
|
Nov 24, 2015 at 17:08 | history | answered | Jan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |