Timeline for How does hyperconjugation affect bond lengths in alkenes?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2019 at 8:03 | answer | added | Taseen Ahmed | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 1, 2018 at 17:00 | answer | added | Amar Shukla | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 1, 2017 at 23:16 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jan 30, 2017 at 22:56 | history | edited | orthocresol | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 16 characters in body
|
| Dec 15, 2015 at 20:25 | answer | added | Curiousone | timeline score: 7 | |
| Dec 1, 2015 at 6:02 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackChemistry/status/671570134583128064 | ||
| Nov 22, 2015 at 13:40 | comment | added | Philipp | Have a look here for a detailed explanation on how hyperconjugation works on a frontier-orbital level. In propene and 3,3-dimethylbut-1-ene you have 3 bonds that can take part in hyperconjugation: in propene it's the 3 $\ce{C-H}$ bonds and in the other compound it's the 3 $\ce{C-C}$ bonds. So, the premise of your question seems to be wrong: The number of "hyperconjugates" is the same, only their types differ. Concentrating on the type, I would say the $\ce{C-C}$ bonds should be a bit more effective at hyperconjugation than the $\ce{C-H}$ bonds. | |
| Nov 22, 2015 at 13:25 | history | edited | orthocresol | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added image, grammar, tags
|
| Nov 22, 2015 at 12:59 | review | First posts | |||
| Nov 22, 2015 at 13:32 | |||||
| Nov 22, 2015 at 12:58 | history | asked | Jay Gitz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |