Timeline for Physical intuition behind negative values for wave function?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2017 at 11:40 | answer | added | guest00 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 3, 2016 at 8:48 | answer | added | porphyrin | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 4, 2015 at 20:23 | comment | added | Wildcat | @ssavec, and it is not even that it can, rather that it is a complex-valued function. | |
| Oct 4, 2015 at 20:21 | answer | added | Wildcat | timeline score: 7 | |
| Oct 4, 2015 at 15:11 | answer | added | orthocresol | timeline score: 12 | |
| Oct 4, 2015 at 14:18 | history | edited | Wildcat |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 21, 2015 at 5:05 | comment | added | user19026 | Don't think about "negative" as being different than a "positive" wave function. What's really important is that the signs are either the same or opposite. It's the difference between signs in wavefunctions that give rise to the interesting stuff. | |
| Aug 19, 2015 at 19:11 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackChemistry/status/634080188427563009 | ||
| Aug 19, 2015 at 8:29 | comment | added | ssavec | And imagine, the wavefunction can easily be even imaginary! (Or, better, complex-valued function). | |
| Aug 19, 2015 at 7:52 | answer | added | Nanoputian | timeline score: 25 | |
| Aug 19, 2015 at 5:31 | history | asked | norlesh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |