Skip to main content
deleted 29 characters in body
Source Link
orthocresol
  • 71.9k
  • 12
  • 249
  • 423

The typical $\ce{Si-Si}$Si–Si single bond length in a silane is around 2.33 angstromsÅ. This is much longer than a typical $\ce{C-C}$C–C single bond (~1.53 Å) and helps explain why silicon-silicon single bonds are so much weaker than carbon-carbon single bonds (bond dissociation energy: ~53 kcal/mol for silicon-silicon vs. ~83 kcal/mol for carbon-carbon single bonds). When we try to form a silicon-silicon double or triple bond, the large separation between the two silicon atoms results in even less effective p-orbital overlap and therefore even weaker pi bondsπ-bonds. The result is that while disilenes and disilynes are known (see the linked SE Chem posts), they are extremely reactive. Only when bulky substituents are placed around the double or triple bonds (to provide some "steric protection" against further reaction) can the molecules be isolated and characterized.

The typical $\ce{Si-Si}$ single bond length in a silane is around 2.33 angstroms. This is much longer than a typical $\ce{C-C}$ single bond (~1.53 Å) and helps explain why silicon-silicon single bonds are so much weaker than carbon-carbon single bonds (bond dissociation energy: ~53 kcal/mol for silicon-silicon vs. ~83 kcal/mol for carbon-carbon single bonds). When we try to form a silicon-silicon double or triple bond, the large separation between the two silicon atoms results in even less effective p-orbital overlap and therefore even weaker pi bonds. The result is that while disilenes and disilynes are known (see the linked SE Chem posts), they are extremely reactive. Only when bulky substituents are placed around the double or triple bonds (to provide some "steric protection" against further reaction) can the molecules be isolated and characterized.

The typical Si–Si single bond length in a silane is around 2.33 Å. This is much longer than a typical C–C single bond (~1.53 Å) and helps explain why silicon-silicon single bonds are so much weaker than carbon-carbon single bonds (bond dissociation energy: ~53 kcal/mol for silicon-silicon vs. ~83 kcal/mol for carbon-carbon single bonds). When we try to form a silicon-silicon double or triple bond, the large separation between the two silicon atoms results in even less effective p-orbital overlap and therefore even weaker π-bonds. The result is that while disilenes and disilynes are known (see the linked SE Chem posts), they are extremely reactive. Only when bulky substituents are placed around the double or triple bonds (to provide some "steric protection" against further reaction) can the molecules be isolated and characterized.

replaced http://chemistry.stackexchange.com/ with https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

The typical $\ce{Si-Si}$ single bond length in a silane is around 2.33 angstroms. This is much longer than a typical $\ce{C-C}$ single bond (~1.53 Å) and helps explain why silicon-silicon single bonds are so much weaker than carbon-carbon single bonds (bond dissociation energy: ~53 kcal/mol for silicon-silicon vs. ~83 kcal/mol for carbon-carbon single bonds). When we try to form a silicon-silicon double or triple bond, the large separation between the two silicon atoms results in even less effective p-orbital overlap and therefore even weaker pi bonds. The result is that while disilenesdisilenes and disilynesdisilynes are known (see the linked SE Chem posts), they are extremely reactive. Only when bulky substituents are placed around the double or triple bonds (to provide some "steric protection" against further reaction) can the molecules be isolated and characterized.

The typical $\ce{Si-Si}$ single bond length in a silane is around 2.33 angstroms. This is much longer than a typical $\ce{C-C}$ single bond (~1.53 Å) and helps explain why silicon-silicon single bonds are so much weaker than carbon-carbon single bonds (bond dissociation energy: ~53 kcal/mol for silicon-silicon vs. ~83 kcal/mol for carbon-carbon single bonds). When we try to form a silicon-silicon double or triple bond, the large separation between the two silicon atoms results in even less effective p-orbital overlap and therefore even weaker pi bonds. The result is that while disilenes and disilynes are known (see the linked SE Chem posts), they are extremely reactive. Only when bulky substituents are placed around the double or triple bonds (to provide some "steric protection" against further reaction) can the molecules be isolated and characterized.

The typical $\ce{Si-Si}$ single bond length in a silane is around 2.33 angstroms. This is much longer than a typical $\ce{C-C}$ single bond (~1.53 Å) and helps explain why silicon-silicon single bonds are so much weaker than carbon-carbon single bonds (bond dissociation energy: ~53 kcal/mol for silicon-silicon vs. ~83 kcal/mol for carbon-carbon single bonds). When we try to form a silicon-silicon double or triple bond, the large separation between the two silicon atoms results in even less effective p-orbital overlap and therefore even weaker pi bonds. The result is that while disilenes and disilynes are known (see the linked SE Chem posts), they are extremely reactive. Only when bulky substituents are placed around the double or triple bonds (to provide some "steric protection" against further reaction) can the molecules be isolated and characterized.

added 94 characters in body
Source Link
ron
  • 85.4k
  • 14
  • 232
  • 323

The typical $\ce{Si-Si}$ single bond length in a silane is around 2.33 angstroms. This is much longer than a typical $\ce{C-C}$ single bond (~1.53 Å) and helps explain why silicon-silicon single bonds are so much weaker than carbon-carbon single bonds (bond dissociation energy: ~53 kcal/mol for silicon silicon-silicon vs. ~83 kcal/mol for carbon-carbon single bonds). When we try to form a silicon-silicon double or triple bond, the large separation between the two silicon atoms results in even less effective p-orbital overlap and therefore even weaker pi bonds. The result is that while disilenes and disylynesdisilynes are known (see the linked SE Chem posts), they are extremely reactive. Only when bulky substituents are placed around the double or triple bonds (to provide some "steric protection" against further reaction) can the molecules be isolated and characterized.

The typical $\ce{Si-Si}$ single bond length in a silane is around 2.33 angstroms. This is much longer than a typical $\ce{C-C}$ single bond (~1.53 Å) and helps explain why silicon-silicon single bonds are so much weaker than carbon-carbon single bonds (bond dissociation energy: ~53 kcal/mol for silicon silicon vs. ~83 kcal/mol for carbon-carbon single bonds). When we try to form a silicon-silicon double or triple bond, the large separation between the two silicon atoms results in even less effective p-orbital overlap and therefore even weaker pi bonds. The result is that while disilenes and disylynes are known, they are extremely reactive. Only when bulky substituents are placed around the double or triple bonds can the molecules be isolated and characterized.

The typical $\ce{Si-Si}$ single bond length in a silane is around 2.33 angstroms. This is much longer than a typical $\ce{C-C}$ single bond (~1.53 Å) and helps explain why silicon-silicon single bonds are so much weaker than carbon-carbon single bonds (bond dissociation energy: ~53 kcal/mol for silicon-silicon vs. ~83 kcal/mol for carbon-carbon single bonds). When we try to form a silicon-silicon double or triple bond, the large separation between the two silicon atoms results in even less effective p-orbital overlap and therefore even weaker pi bonds. The result is that while disilenes and disilynes are known (see the linked SE Chem posts), they are extremely reactive. Only when bulky substituents are placed around the double or triple bonds (to provide some "steric protection" against further reaction) can the molecules be isolated and characterized.

Source Link
ron
  • 85.4k
  • 14
  • 232
  • 323
Loading