Skip to main content
changing to proper math to avoid pseudo-chemistry (2C-H -> 2c - h), harmonizing order of variables
Source Link

Well, that is simple.

A Carbon  (C) makes 4 bonds, a Hydrogen  (H) or a halogen (X) makes 1 bond and Nitrogen  (N) makes three bonds. So in a molecule with C$c$ Carbons, H$h$ Hydrogens, X Halogens$x$ halogens and N$n$ Nitrogens, we will have $\small\ce{4*C +3*N + X +H}\ \ \ $$4c+h+x+3n$ "bonding capacity".

Assuming there are no rings, no double/triple bonds, we must have $\small\ce{C +H + X +N -1}$$c+h+x+n-1$ bonds in between these atoms [think like how many dashes you can draw between $n$$m$ $\ce{O}$'s: $\ce{O-O-O}$ two dashes for three $\ce{O}$'s apparently].

Since each bond uses one "bonding capacity" from each of the two atoms its binding, $\small\ce{C +H +X +N -1}$$c+h+x+n-1$ bonds are using $\small\ce{2*(C +H +X +N-1)}$$2(c+h+x+n-1)$ bonding capacity. So the remaining capacity is:

$$\ce{(4*C +3*N +X +H)\ -\ 2*(C +H +X +N - 1)\ =\ 2*C-H-X +N +2}$$$$(4c+h+x+3n)-2(c+h+x+n-1)=2c-h-x+n+2$$

If this is larger than zero, it means our molecule is unsaturated, i.e. still has a capacity to make bonds. And our assumption that "there are no rings, no double/triple bonds" is wrong. This bonding capacity is used in forming new bonds either in rings or in pi-bonds. Since each bond uses two capacity one from each side we should have $\small\ce{C-H/2-X/2+N/2+1}$$c-h/2-x/2+n/2+1$ "unsaturated" bonds.

Well, that is simple.

A Carbon(C) makes 4 bonds, a Hydrogen(H) or a halogen (X) makes 1 bond and Nitrogen(N) makes three bonds. So in a molecule with C Carbons, H Hydrogens, X Halogens and N Nitrogens, we will have $\small\ce{4*C +3*N + X +H}\ \ \ $ "bonding capacity".

Assuming there are no rings, no double/triple bonds, we must have $\small\ce{C +H + X +N -1}$ bonds in between these atoms [think like how many dashes you can draw between $n$ $\ce{O}$'s: $\ce{O-O-O}$ two dashes for three $\ce{O}$'s apparently].

Since each bond uses one "bonding capacity" from each of the two atoms its binding, $\small\ce{C +H +X +N -1}$ bonds are using $\small\ce{2*(C +H +X +N-1)}$ bonding capacity. So the remaining capacity is:

$$\ce{(4*C +3*N +X +H)\ -\ 2*(C +H +X +N - 1)\ =\ 2*C-H-X +N +2}$$

If this is larger than zero, it means our molecule is unsaturated, i.e. still has a capacity to make bonds. And our assumption that "there are no rings, no double/triple bonds" is wrong. This bonding capacity is used in forming new bonds either in rings or in pi-bonds. Since each bond uses two capacity one from each side we should have $\small\ce{C-H/2-X/2+N/2+1}$ "unsaturated" bonds.

Well, that is simple.

A Carbon  (C) makes 4 bonds, a Hydrogen  (H) or a halogen (X) makes 1 bond and Nitrogen  (N) makes three bonds. So in a molecule with $c$ Carbons, $h$ Hydrogens, $x$ halogens and $n$ Nitrogens, we will have $4c+h+x+3n$ "bonding capacity".

Assuming there are no rings, no double/triple bonds, we must have $c+h+x+n-1$ bonds in between these atoms [think like how many dashes you can draw between $m$ $\ce{O}$'s: $\ce{O-O-O}$ two dashes for three $\ce{O}$'s apparently].

Since each bond uses one "bonding capacity" from each of the two atoms its binding, $c+h+x+n-1$ bonds are using $2(c+h+x+n-1)$ bonding capacity. So the remaining capacity is:

$$(4c+h+x+3n)-2(c+h+x+n-1)=2c-h-x+n+2$$

If this is larger than zero, it means our molecule is unsaturated, i.e. still has a capacity to make bonds. And our assumption that "there are no rings, no double/triple bonds" is wrong. This bonding capacity is used in forming new bonds either in rings or in pi-bonds. Since each bond uses two capacity one from each side we should have $c-h/2-x/2+n/2+1$ "unsaturated" bonds.

Bounty Ended with 50 reputation awarded by Aditya Sriram

Well, that is simple.

A carbonCarbon(C) makes 4 bonds, a HHydrogen(H) or a halogen (X) makes 1 bond, N and Nitrogen(N) makes three bonds. So in a molecule with C Carbons, H Hydrogens, X Halogens and N Nitrogens, we will have (4$\small\ce{4*C +3*N + X +H}\ \ \ $ "C+3bonding capacityN+X+H) "bonding capacity"".

Assuming there are no rings, no double/triple bonds, we must have (C+H+X+N-1)$\small\ce{C +H + X +N -1}$ bonds in between these atoms [think like how many dashes you can draw between n o's$n$ $\ce{O}$'s: o-o-o -two$\ce{O-O-O}$ two dashes for three o's$\ce{O}$'s apparently].

Since each bond uses one "bonding capacity" from each of the two atoms its binding, (C+H+X+N-1)$\small\ce{C +H +X +N -1}$ bonds are using 2*(C+H+X+N-1)$\small\ce{2*(C +H +X +N-1)}$ bonding capacity. So the remaining capacity is:

(4C+3N+X+H)-2*(C+H+X+N-1) = 2C-H-X+N+2$$\ce{(4*C +3*N +X +H)\ -\ 2*(C +H +X +N - 1)\ =\ 2*C-H-X +N +2}$$

If this is larger than zero, it means our molecule is unsaturated, i.e. still has a capacity to make bonds. And our assumption ["therethat "there are no rings, no double/triple bonds"]bonds" is wrong. This bonding capacity is used in forming new bonds either in rings or in pi-bonds. Since each bond uses two capacity -oneone from each side- we should have C-H/2-X/2+N/2+1$\small\ce{C-H/2-X/2+N/2+1}$ "unsaturated" bonds.

Well, that is simple.

A carbon makes 4 bonds, a H or a halogen (X) makes 1 bond, N makes three bonds. So in a molecule with C Carbons, H Hydrogens, X Halogens and N Nitrogens, we will have (4C+3N+X+H) "bonding capacity".

Assuming there are no rings, no double/triple bonds, we must have (C+H+X+N-1) bonds in between these atoms [think like how many dashes you can draw between n o's: o-o-o -two dashes for three o's apparently].

Since each bond uses one "bonding capacity" from each of the two atoms its binding, (C+H+X+N-1) bonds are using 2*(C+H+X+N-1) bonding capacity. So the remaining capacity is:

(4C+3N+X+H)-2*(C+H+X+N-1) = 2C-H-X+N+2

If this is larger than zero, it means our molecule is unsaturated, i.e. still has a capacity to make bonds. And our assumption ["there are no rings, no double/triple bonds"] is wrong. This bonding capacity is used in forming new bonds either in rings or in pi-bonds. Since each bond uses two capacity -one from each side- we should have C-H/2-X/2+N/2+1 "unsaturated" bonds.

Well, that is simple.

A Carbon(C) makes 4 bonds, a Hydrogen(H) or a halogen (X) makes 1 bond and Nitrogen(N) makes three bonds. So in a molecule with C Carbons, H Hydrogens, X Halogens and N Nitrogens, we will have $\small\ce{4*C +3*N + X +H}\ \ \ $ "bonding capacity".

Assuming there are no rings, no double/triple bonds, we must have $\small\ce{C +H + X +N -1}$ bonds in between these atoms [think like how many dashes you can draw between $n$ $\ce{O}$'s: $\ce{O-O-O}$ two dashes for three $\ce{O}$'s apparently].

Since each bond uses one "bonding capacity" from each of the two atoms its binding, $\small\ce{C +H +X +N -1}$ bonds are using $\small\ce{2*(C +H +X +N-1)}$ bonding capacity. So the remaining capacity is:

$$\ce{(4*C +3*N +X +H)\ -\ 2*(C +H +X +N - 1)\ =\ 2*C-H-X +N +2}$$

If this is larger than zero, it means our molecule is unsaturated, i.e. still has a capacity to make bonds. And our assumption that "there are no rings, no double/triple bonds" is wrong. This bonding capacity is used in forming new bonds either in rings or in pi-bonds. Since each bond uses two capacity one from each side we should have $\small\ce{C-H/2-X/2+N/2+1}$ "unsaturated" bonds.

Source Link
sencer
  • 662
  • 6
  • 7

Well, that is simple.

A carbon makes 4 bonds, a H or a halogen (X) makes 1 bond, N makes three bonds. So in a molecule with C Carbons, H Hydrogens, X Halogens and N Nitrogens, we will have (4C+3N+X+H) "bonding capacity".

Assuming there are no rings, no double/triple bonds, we must have (C+H+X+N-1) bonds in between these atoms [think like how many dashes you can draw between n o's: o-o-o -two dashes for three o's apparently].

Since each bond uses one "bonding capacity" from each of the two atoms its binding, (C+H+X+N-1) bonds are using 2*(C+H+X+N-1) bonding capacity. So the remaining capacity is:

(4C+3N+X+H)-2*(C+H+X+N-1) = 2C-H-X+N+2

If this is larger than zero, it means our molecule is unsaturated, i.e. still has a capacity to make bonds. And our assumption ["there are no rings, no double/triple bonds"] is wrong. This bonding capacity is used in forming new bonds either in rings or in pi-bonds. Since each bond uses two capacity -one from each side- we should have C-H/2-X/2+N/2+1 "unsaturated" bonds.