Skip to main content
18 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:57 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://chemistry.stackexchange.com/ with https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/
Feb 4, 2015 at 14:53 vote accept Sparkler
Feb 4, 2015 at 13:13 comment added LordStryker @Sparkler - By dimer I mean a two-body system. Each monomer in the dimer do not have to be identical.
Jan 30, 2015 at 18:46 comment added Sparkler Atomdroid is using UFF. Would that be as reliable as SCF for this purpose?
Jan 30, 2015 at 16:45 comment added Sparkler No, not just dimers. Eventually I'm interested in binding energies of reactive dyes to cellulose, for example.
Jan 30, 2015 at 16:41 comment added LordStryker @jjgoings He is, I'm just pointing that out for any future visitors.
Jan 30, 2015 at 16:40 comment added jjgoings @LordStryker Oh, I thought the OP was talking about dimers.
Jan 30, 2015 at 16:39 comment added LordStryker @jjgoings Cautionary note. The SAPT routines for anything greater than a dimer interaction is broken and shouldn't be used. 3-body and above methods are utterly wrong (last I checked).
S Jan 30, 2015 at 16:38 history suggested Sparkler CC BY-SA 3.0
making some subscript look nicer in tex; adding urls
Jan 30, 2015 at 16:38 comment added jjgoings @LordStryker ...I like kcal/mol :/
Jan 30, 2015 at 16:38 comment added jjgoings For what it's worth, you may consider using SAPT to compute interaction/binding energies directly. It also allows for a physical decomposition of the nature of the interaction. PSI4 contains it, is free, and is apparently pretty fast. sirius.chem.vt.edu/psi4manual/4.0b5/sapt.html
Jan 30, 2015 at 16:32 review Suggested edits
S Jan 30, 2015 at 16:38
Jan 30, 2015 at 16:29 history edited LordStryker CC BY-SA 3.0
added 226 characters in body
Jan 30, 2015 at 16:29 comment added LordStryker Yes, as long as you are comparing energies that were all determined at the same level of theory (method/basis etc.). Be sure to convert Hartrees to kJ/mol (or kcal/mol if you're still stuck in the 1970s). Hartrees is unnecessary and inefficient when taking differences of energies (Hartrees are appropriate for absolute energies but absolute energies are completely inaccurate anyway).
Jan 30, 2015 at 16:25 comment added Sparkler I'm looking at NWChem's sample input files. If I want to compare "binding energies" of various combinations, can I use the SCF method on two molecules separately and substract from the SCF value for the dimer?
Jan 30, 2015 at 15:47 history edited LordStryker CC BY-SA 3.0
added 220 characters in body
Jan 30, 2015 at 15:42 history edited LordStryker CC BY-SA 3.0
added 220 characters in body
Jan 30, 2015 at 15:36 history answered LordStryker CC BY-SA 3.0