Skip to main content
replaced http://chemistry.stackexchange.com/ with https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

I have written up a previous answer which addressesa previous answer which addresses how to predict an interaction energy ($E_{\mathrm{int}}$) which is completely different from a binding energy ($E_{\mathrm{bind}}$). However, much of the concepts will remain the same. I will try to outline here what in fact is the difference between an interaction energy and a binding energy. Unfortunately, 'binding energy' is tossed around a lot in the literature and consequently grossly misused. I hope to clarify the subtle differences between these two terms in my answer to your question.

I have written up a previous answer which addresses how to predict an interaction energy ($E_{\mathrm{int}}$) which is completely different from a binding energy ($E_{\mathrm{bind}}$). However, much of the concepts will remain the same. I will try to outline here what in fact is the difference between an interaction energy and a binding energy. Unfortunately, 'binding energy' is tossed around a lot in the literature and consequently grossly misused. I hope to clarify the subtle differences between these two terms in my answer to your question.

I have written up a previous answer which addresses how to predict an interaction energy ($E_{\mathrm{int}}$) which is completely different from a binding energy ($E_{\mathrm{bind}}$). However, much of the concepts will remain the same. I will try to outline here what in fact is the difference between an interaction energy and a binding energy. Unfortunately, 'binding energy' is tossed around a lot in the literature and consequently grossly misused. I hope to clarify the subtle differences between these two terms in my answer to your question.

making some subscript look nicer in tex; adding urls
Source Link

$E_{int} = E_{opt-dimer} - (E_{mon1} + E_{mon2})$$E_{\text{int}} = E_{\text{opt-dimer}} - (E_{\text{mon1}} + E_{\text{mon2}})$

$E_{bind} = E_{opt-dimer} - (E_{opt-mon1} + E_{opt-mon2})$$E_{\text{bind}} = E_{\text{opt-dimer}} - (E_{\text{opt-mon1}} + E_{\text{opt-mon2}})$

As far as tools go, you can choose from a number of available quantum software packages. Gaussian 09 Gaussian 09 is a popular choice but very expensive. Q-Chem Q-Chem (paid) has the benefit of having the most beautiful, gorgeous, well-laid out documentation of anything I've ever seen (makes for a good supplemental textbook to boot). NWChem NWChem is free I thinkopensource. Google can help you find plenty of options.

$E_{int} = E_{opt-dimer} - (E_{mon1} + E_{mon2})$

$E_{bind} = E_{opt-dimer} - (E_{opt-mon1} + E_{opt-mon2})$

As far as tools go, you can choose from a number of available quantum software packages. Gaussian 09 is a popular choice but very expensive. Q-Chem (paid) has the benefit of having the most beautiful, gorgeous, well-laid out documentation of anything I've ever seen (makes for a good supplemental textbook to boot). NWChem is free I think. Google can help you find plenty of options.

$E_{\text{int}} = E_{\text{opt-dimer}} - (E_{\text{mon1}} + E_{\text{mon2}})$

$E_{\text{bind}} = E_{\text{opt-dimer}} - (E_{\text{opt-mon1}} + E_{\text{opt-mon2}})$

As far as tools go, you can choose from a number of available quantum software packages. Gaussian 09 is a popular choice but very expensive. Q-Chem (paid) has the benefit of having the most beautiful, gorgeous, well-laid out documentation of anything I've ever seen (makes for a good supplemental textbook to boot). NWChem is opensource. Google can help you find plenty of options.

added 226 characters in body
Source Link
LordStryker
  • 4.6k
  • 1
  • 42
  • 62

One last important note: When determining differences of energies (such as you do to get an interaction or binding energy), ALL energies being compared must be evaluated at the SAME LEVEL OF THEORY (method/basis set, etc.).

One last important note: When determining differences of energies (such as you do to get an interaction or binding energy), ALL energies being compared must be evaluated at the SAME LEVEL OF THEORY (method/basis set, etc.).

added 220 characters in body
Source Link
LordStryker
  • 4.6k
  • 1
  • 42
  • 62
Loading
added 220 characters in body
Source Link
LordStryker
  • 4.6k
  • 1
  • 42
  • 62
Loading
Source Link
LordStryker
  • 4.6k
  • 1
  • 42
  • 62
Loading